These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28568273)

  • 21. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES II. THE "HANDICAP" PRINCIPLE.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A; Nee S
    Evolution; 1991 Sep; 45(6):1431-1442. PubMed ID: 28563835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The dilemma of Fisherian sexual selection: mate choice for indirect benefits despite rarity and overall weakness of trait-preference genetic correlation.
    Greenfield MD; Alem S; Limousin D; Bailey NW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3524-36. PubMed ID: 25308282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. THE DARWIN-FISHER THEORY OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN MONOGAMOUS BIRDS.
    Kirkpatrick M; Price T; Arnold SJ
    Evolution; 1990 Feb; 44(1):180-193. PubMed ID: 28568205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
    van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.
    Houle D; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.
    Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A
    Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Runaway sexual selection when female preferences are directly selected.
    Hall DW; Kirkpatrick M; West B
    Evolution; 2000 Dec; 54(6):1862-9. PubMed ID: 11209766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Condition-dependence, pleiotropy and the handicap principle of sexual selection in melanin-based colouration.
    Roulin A
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 May; 91(2):328-48. PubMed ID: 25631160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The causes of variation in the presence of genetic covariance between sexual traits and preferences.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 May; 91(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 25808899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits.
    Schluter D; Price T
    Proc Biol Sci; 1993 Jul; 253(1336):117-22. PubMed ID: 8396772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Potential fitness benefits from mate selection in the Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).
    Rudolfsen G; Figenschou L; Folstad I; Nordeide JT; Søreng E
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 18(1):172-9. PubMed ID: 15669974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Describing mate preference functions and other function-valued traits.
    Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD; Gray DA; Höbel G; Rebar D; Reichert MS; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Sep; 30(9):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 28556474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Veiled preferences and cryptic female choice could underlie the origin of novel sexual traits.
    Moehring AJ; Boughman JW
    Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180878. PubMed ID: 30958124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mating preferences of selfish sex chromosomes.
    Muralidhar P
    Nature; 2019 Jun; 570(7761):376-379. PubMed ID: 31168095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.