These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28568413)

  • 21. Sexual selection counteracts extinction of small populations of the bulb mites.
    Jarzebowska M; Radwan J
    Evolution; 2010 May; 64(5):1283-9. PubMed ID: 19930452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Demographic stochasticity, allee effects, and extinction: the influence of mating system and sex ratio.
    Lee AM; Saether BE; Engen S
    Am Nat; 2011 Mar; 177(3):301-13. PubMed ID: 21460539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. NEUTRAL THEORY OF QUANTITATIVE GENETIC VARIANCE IN AN ISLAND MODEL WITH LOCAL EXTINCTION AND COLONIZATION.
    Lande R
    Evolution; 1992 Apr; 46(2):381-389. PubMed ID: 28564025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating selection on nonsynonymous mutations.
    Loewe L; Charlesworth B; Bartolomé C; Nöel V
    Genetics; 2006 Feb; 172(2):1079-92. PubMed ID: 16299397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Similar Efficacies of Selection Shape Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes in Both Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens.
    Cooper BS; Burrus CR; Ji C; Hahn MW; Montooth KL
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Aug; 5(10):2165-76. PubMed ID: 26297726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Expansion load: recessive mutations and the role of standing genetic variation.
    Peischl S; Excoffier L
    Mol Ecol; 2015 May; 24(9):2084-94. PubMed ID: 25786336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Demographic factors and genetic variation influence population persistence under environmental change.
    Willi Y; Hoffmann AA
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 19120814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantifying the mutational meltdown in diploid populations.
    Coron C; Méléard S; Porcher E; Robert A
    Am Nat; 2013 May; 181(5):623-36. PubMed ID: 23594546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
    Keightley PD; Otto SP
    Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Overdispersed molecular evolution in constant environments.
    Iwasa Y
    J Theor Biol; 1993 Oct; 164(3):373-93. PubMed ID: 8246525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The speed of adaptation in large asexual populations.
    Wilke CO
    Genetics; 2004 Aug; 167(4):2045-53. PubMed ID: 15342539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The extinction time under mutational meltdown driven by high mutation rates.
    Lansch-Justen L; Cusseddu D; Schmitz MA; Bank C
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Jul; 12(7):e9046. PubMed ID: 35813923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting the deleterious effects of mutation load in fragmented populations.
    Jaquiéry J; Guillaume F; Perrin N
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 18847439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of antagonistic pleiotropy on the estimation of the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious mutations.
    Fernández B; García-Dorado A; Caballero A
    Genetics; 2005 Dec; 171(4):2097-112. PubMed ID: 16118193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2013 Apr; 67(4):1189-95. PubMed ID: 23550766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Constrained evolution of a quantitative character by pleiotropic mutation.
    Tanaka Y
    Theor Popul Biol; 2005 Dec; 68(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 16054182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. MUTATION LOAD AND THE SURVIVAL OF SMALL POPULATIONS.
    Lynch M; Gabriel W
    Evolution; 1990 Nov; 44(7):1725-1737. PubMed ID: 28567811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Probability of fixation under weak selection: a branching process unifying approach.
    Lambert A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Jun; 69(4):419-41. PubMed ID: 16504230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Purifying selection in mammalian mitochondrial protein-coding genes is highly effective and congruent with evolution of nuclear genes.
    Popadin KY; Nikolaev SI; Junier T; Baranova M; Antonarakis SE
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Feb; 30(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 22983951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mating systems and selection efficacy: a test using chloroplastic sequence data in Angiosperms.
    Glémin S; Muyle A
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Jul; 27(7):1386-99. PubMed ID: 24674012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.