BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28568838)

  • 1. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF CONTINUOUS CHARACTERS: A SIMULATION STUDY.
    Martins EP; Garland T
    Evolution; 1991 May; 45(3):534-557. PubMed ID: 28568838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the relative merits of a few methods to detect evolutionary trends.
    Laurin M
    Syst Biol; 2010 Dec; 59(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 20937759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PHYLOGENIES, SPATIAL AUTOREGRESSION, AND THE COMPARATIVE METHOD: A COMPUTER SIMULATION TEST.
    Martins EP
    Evolution; 1996 Oct; 50(5):1750-1765. PubMed ID: 28565598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of branch length errors on the performance of phylogenetically independent contrasts.
    Díaz-Uriarte R; Garland T
    Syst Biol; 1998 Dec; 47(4):654-72. PubMed ID: 12066309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting a Key Innovation in Evolutionary Biology: Felsenstein's "Phylogenies and the Comparative Method".
    Huey RB; Garland T; Turelli M
    Am Nat; 2019 Jun; 193(6):755-772. PubMed ID: 31094602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test.
    Martins EP; Diniz-Filho JA; Housworth EA
    Evolution; 2002 Jan; 56(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11913655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Independent Evolution Method Is Not a Viable Phylogenetic Comparative Method.
    Griffin RH; Yapuncich GS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144147. PubMed ID: 26683838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.
    Blomberg SP; Garland T; Ives AR
    Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):717-45. PubMed ID: 12778543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CONDUCTING PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE STUDIES WHEN THE PHYLOGENY IS NOT KNOWN.
    Martins EP
    Evolution; 1996 Feb; 50(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 28568876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polytomies and phylogenetically independent contrasts: examination of the bounded degrees of freedom approach.
    Garland T; Díaz-Uriarte R
    Syst Biol; 1999 Sep; 48(3):547-58. PubMed ID: 12066293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts.
    Ackerly DD
    Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1480-92. PubMed ID: 11108577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing evolutionary rates for different phenotypic traits on a phylogeny using likelihood.
    Adams DC
    Syst Biol; 2013 Mar; 62(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 23024153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating Correlated Rates of Trait Evolution with Uncertainty.
    Caetano DS; Harmon LJ
    Syst Biol; 2019 May; 68(3):412-429. PubMed ID: 30329124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Likelihood-Based Parameter Estimation for High-Dimensional Phylogenetic Comparative Models: Overcoming the Limitations of "Distance-Based" Methods.
    Goolsby EW
    Syst Biol; 2016 Sep; 65(5):852-70. PubMed ID: 27316673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of topological inaccuracy in evolutionary trees on the phylogenetic comparative method of independent contrasts.
    Symonds MR
    Syst Biol; 2002 Aug; 51(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 12227998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying and comparing phylogenetic evolutionary rates for shape and other high-dimensional phenotypic data.
    Adams DC
    Syst Biol; 2014 Mar; 63(2):166-77. PubMed ID: 24335426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolutionary correlation using likelihood.
    Revell LJ; Collar DC
    Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):1090-100. PubMed ID: 19154380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Poor statistical performance of the Mantel test in phylogenetic comparative analyses.
    Harmon LJ; Glor RE
    Evolution; 2010 Jul; 64(7):2173-8. PubMed ID: 20163450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. TESTING FOR UNEQUAL AMOUNTS OF EVOLUTION IN A CONTINUOUS CHARACTER ON DIFFERENT BRANCHES OF A PHYLOGENETIC TREE USING LINEAR AND SQUARED-CHANGE PARSIMONY: AN EXAMPLE USING LESSER ANTILLEAN ANOLIS LIZARDS.
    Butler MA; Losos JB
    Evolution; 1997 Oct; 51(5):1623-1635. PubMed ID: 28568623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.