These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28569526)

  • 1. Noisy preferences in risky choice: A cautionary note.
    Bhatia S; Loomes G
    Psychol Rev; 2017 Oct; 124(5):678-687. PubMed ID: 28569526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing utility functions between risky and riskless choice in rhesus monkeys.
    Bujold PM; Seak LCU; Schultz W; Ferrari-Toniolo S
    Anim Cogn; 2022 Apr; 25(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 34568979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the Flexibility of Basic Risk Attitudes in Monkeys.
    Farashahi S; Azab H; Hayden B; Soltani A
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(18):4383-4398. PubMed ID: 29626169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The formation of preference in risky choice.
    Glickman M; Sharoni O; Levy DJ; Niebur E; Stuphorn V; Usher M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1007201. PubMed ID: 31465438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preference reversals during risk elicitation.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Martin R; Hall L; Johansson P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Mar; 149(3):585-589. PubMed ID: 31318260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How the twain can meet: Prospect theory and models of heuristics in risky choice.
    Pachur T; Suter RS; Hertwig R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Mar; 93():44-73. PubMed ID: 28189037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The construct-behavior gap and the description-experience gap: Comment on Regenwetter and Robinson (2017).
    Hertwig R; Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Oct; 125(5):844-849. PubMed ID: 30299143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is making a risky choice based on a weighting and adding process? An eye-tracking investigation.
    Su Y; Rao LL; Sun HY; Du XL; Li X; Li S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1765-80. PubMed ID: 23687917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The neural basis of risky choice with affective outcomes.
    Suter RS; Pachur T; Hertwig R; Endestad T; Biele G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122475. PubMed ID: 25830918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The continuous and changing impact of affect on risky decision-making.
    Asutay E; Västfjäll D
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10613. PubMed ID: 35739234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the neurochemical underpinnings of animal models of risky choice: Methodological and analytic considerations.
    Yates JR
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2019 Apr; 27(2):178-201. PubMed ID: 30570275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do tufted capuchin monkeys play the odds? Flexible risk preferences in Sapajus spp.
    De Petrillo F; Ventricelli M; Ponsi G; Addessi E
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Jan; 18(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 24993065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk Preferences in Surrogate Decision Making.
    Batteux E; Ferguson E; Tunney RJ
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jul; 64(4):290-297. PubMed ID: 28922998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A neuronal prospect theory model in the brain reward circuitry.
    Imaizumi Y; Tymula A; Tsubo Y; Matsumoto M; Yamada H
    Nat Commun; 2022 Oct; 13(1):5855. PubMed ID: 36195765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive abilities affect decision errors but not risk preferences: A meta-analysis.
    Mechera-Ostrovsky T; Heinke S; Andraszewicz S; Rieskamp J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1719-1750. PubMed ID: 35352289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are risky choices actually guided by a compensatory process? New insights from FMRI.
    Rao LL; Zhou Y; Xu L; Liang ZY; Jiang T; Li S
    PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e14756. PubMed ID: 21412409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The association between experience-based risky choice and mathematical ability.
    Sheng Y; Yu M; Liu P; Wang X; Bai X; Zhou X
    Psych J; 2023 Feb; 12(1):137-149. PubMed ID: 36223898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference.
    Dohmen T; Falk A; Huffman D; Sunde U
    J Econ Perspect; 2018; 32(2):115-34. PubMed ID: 30203932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The priority heuristic: making choices without trade-offs.
    Brandstätter E; Gigerenzer G; Hertwig R
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Apr; 113(2):409-32. PubMed ID: 16637767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision making.
    Weber BJ; Huettel SA
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1234():104-15. PubMed ID: 18710652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.