These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28569527)
1. Pseudocontingencies and choice behavior in probabilistic environments with context-dependent outcomes. Meiser T; Rummel J; Fleig H J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):50-67. PubMed ID: 28569527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pseudocontingency inference and choice: The role of information sampling. Bott FM; Meiser T J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1624-1644. PubMed ID: 32297791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Statistical numeracy as a moderator of (pseudo)contingency effects on decision behavior. Fleig H; Meiser T; Ettlin F; Rummel J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():68-79. PubMed ID: 28189707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pseudocontingencies: an integrative account of an intriguing cognitive illusion. Fiedler K; Freytag P; Meiser T Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):187-206. PubMed ID: 19159153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pseudocontingencies can override genuine contingencies between multiple cues. Fiedler K Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 20702869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions. Hagmayer Y; Sloman SA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 19203168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prior probabilities modulate cortical surprise responses: A study of event-related potentials. Seer C; Lange F; Boos M; Dengler R; Kopp B Brain Cogn; 2016 Jul; 106():78-89. PubMed ID: 27266394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The time of a complex sensorimotor choice reaction in subjects with differing functional mobility of the nervous processes]. Makarenko NV Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1989; 39(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 2603548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Communicated beliefs about action-outcomes: The role of initial confirmation in the adoption and maintenance of unsupported beliefs. Pilditch TD; Custers R Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():46-63. PubMed ID: 28478953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hold it! The influence of lingering rewards on choice diversification and persistence. Schulze C; van Ravenzwaaij D; Newell BR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1752-1767. PubMed ID: 28383956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biased preferences through exploitation: How initial biases are consolidated in reward-rich environments. Harris C; Fiedler K; Marien H; Custers R J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Oct; 149(10):1855-1877. PubMed ID: 32324024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Base-rate neglect as a function of base rates in probabilistic contingency learning. Kutzner F; Freytag P; Vogel T; Fiedler K J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Jul; 90(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 18683610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contingency inferences from base rates: A parsimonious strategy? Pivecka N; Ingendahl M; McCaughey L; Vogel T Mem Cognit; 2024 Oct; 52(7):1609-1625. PubMed ID: 38710883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is social decision making for close others consistent across domains and within individuals? Guassi Moreira JF; Tashjian SM; Galván A; Silvers JA J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Aug; 149(8):1509-1526. PubMed ID: 31804124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decision making and learning while taking sequential risks. Pleskac TJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):167-85. PubMed ID: 18194061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The neural basis of regret and relief during a sequential risk-taking task. Liu Z; Li L; Zheng L; Hu Z; Roberts ID; Guo X; Yang G Neuroscience; 2016 Jul; 327():136-45. PubMed ID: 27102420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]