112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28569996)
1. Technical Note: Validation of two methods to determine contact area between breast and compression paddle in mammography.
Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; van Lier MGJTB; Highnam RP; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4040-4044. PubMed ID: 28569996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization.
Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; Highnam R; Chan A; Böhm-Vélez M; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 25596915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical validation of a pressure-standardized compression mammography system.
den Boer D; Dam-Vervloet LAJ; Boomsma MF; de Boer E; van Dalen JA; Poot L
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():251-254. PubMed ID: 30017290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast compression and experienced pain during mammography by use of three different compression paddles.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Evensen KT; Hantho C; Iden KA; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():59-65. PubMed ID: 31084760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical standardisation of mammographic compression using Volpara software.
Serwan E; Matthews D; Davies J; Chau M
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):789-794. PubMed ID: 33419655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of compression paddle tilt correction on volumetric breast density estimation.
Kallenberg MG; van Gils CH; Lokate M; den Heeten GJ; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(16):5155-68. PubMed ID: 22842727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Force balancing in mammographic compression.
Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; Neeter LM; van Lier MG; Neeleman C; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):518. PubMed ID: 26745945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening.
Holland K; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM; den Heeten GJ; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 19(1):126. PubMed ID: 29183348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice.
Jeukens CRLPN; van Dijk T; Berben C; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MBI
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2545-2552. PubMed ID: 30617472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Closed-loop control of compression paddle motion to reduce blurring in mammograms.
Ma WK; Howard D; Hogg P
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4139-4147. PubMed ID: 28494106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of discomfort during mammography utilizing a radiolucent cushioning pad.
Markle L; Roux S; Sayre JW
Breast J; 2004; 10(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 15239794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method to measure paddle and detector pressures and footprints in mammography.
Hogg P; Szczepura K; Darlington A; Maxwell A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041907. PubMed ID: 23556901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experience of pain during mammographic screening by three different compression paddles.
Moshina N; Sagstad S; Holen ÅS; Backmann HA; Westermann LC; Hofvind S
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Aug; 29(5):903-910. PubMed ID: 37453253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic compression in Asian women.
Lau S; Abdul Aziz YF; Ng KH
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175781. PubMed ID: 28419125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical prototype implementation enabling an improved day-to-day mammography compression.
Hertel M; Liu C; Song H; Golatta M; Kappler S; Nanke R; Radicke M; Maier A; Rose G
Phys Med; 2023 Feb; 106():102524. PubMed ID: 36641900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast compression in mammography: pressure distribution patterns.
Dustler M; Andersson I; Brorson H; Fröjd P; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S; Förnvik D
Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):973-80. PubMed ID: 22949732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. To what extent are objectively measured mammographic imaging techniques associated with compression outcomes.
Hudson SM; Wilkinson LS; De Stavola BL; Dos-Santos-Silva I
Br J Radiol; 2023 Jun; 96(1146):20230089. PubMed ID: 37086069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards personalized compression in mammography: a comparison study between pressure- and force-standardization.
de Groot JE; Branderhorst W; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJM
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 25554008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
