1067 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28570236)
21. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Lower Surgical Risk Scores: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Early Outcomes.
Arora S; Strassle PD; Ramm CJ; Rhodes JA; Vaidya SR; Caranasos TG; Vavalle JP
Heart Lung Circ; 2017 Aug; 26(8):840-845. PubMed ID: 28169084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Health Status Benefits of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: Results From the PARTNER 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Baron SJ; Arnold SV; Wang K; Magnuson EA; Chinnakondepali K; Makkar R; Herrmann HC; Kodali S; Thourani VH; Kapadia S; Svensson L; Brown DL; Mack MJ; Smith CR; Leon MB; Cohen DJ;
JAMA Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 2(8):837-845. PubMed ID: 28658491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Midterm outcome of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low to intermediate risk patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Wang Y; Zhou Y; Zhang L; Zhu J
J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 29655505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis patients at low to moderate surgical risk: a comprehensive meta-analysis.
Elmaraezy A; Ismail A; Abushouk AI; Eltoomy M; Saad S; Negida A; Abdelaty OM; Abdallah AR; Aboelfotoh AM; Hassan HM; Elmaraezy AG; Morsi M; Althaher F; Althaher M; AlSafadi AM
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Aug; 17(1):234. PubMed ID: 28836953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sex-related differences in outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: Insights from the PARTNER Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve).
Williams M; Kodali SK; Hahn RT; Humphries KH; Nkomo VT; Cohen DJ; Douglas PS; Mack M; McAndrew TC; Svensson L; Thourani VH; Tuzcu EM; Weissman NJ; Kirtane AJ; Leon MB
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 63(15):1522-8. PubMed ID: 24561149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Comment on "1-year outcomes after transfemoral transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement. Results from the Italian OBSERVANT study"].
Patrício L
Rev Port Cardiol; 2015 Nov; 34(11):711-2. PubMed ID: 26866133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.
Koshy AN; Murphy A; Farouque O; Horrigan M; Yudi MB
Heart Lung Circ; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1527-1533. PubMed ID: 32280013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Chronological comparison of TAVI and SAVR stratified to surgical risk: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Park DY; An S; Kassab K; Jolly N; Attanasio S; Sawaqed R; Malhotra S; Doukky R; Vij A
Acta Cardiol; 2023 Sep; 78(7):778-789. PubMed ID: 37294002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-surgical-risk patients: An updated meta-analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Wats K; Patel J; Chava S; Gotesman J; Malik BA; Frankel R; Shani J; Gidwani U
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):169-178. PubMed ID: 31631514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 1-Year Outcomes After Transfemoral Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the Italian OBSERVANT Study.
Tamburino C; Barbanti M; D'Errigo P; Ranucci M; Onorati F; Covello RD; Santini F; Rosato S; Santoro G; Fusco D; Grossi C; Seccareccia F;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Aug; 66(7):804-812. PubMed ID: 26271063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Conventional surgery, sutureless valves, and transapical aortic valve replacement: what is the best option for patients with aortic valve stenosis? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis.
D'Onofrio A; Rizzoli G; Messina A; Alfieri O; Lorusso R; Salizzoni S; Glauber M; Di Bartolomeo R; Besola L; Rinaldi M; Troise G; Gerosa G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Nov; 146(5):1065-70; discussion 1070-1. PubMed ID: 24021955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Comparative Study of TAVR versus SAVR in Moderate and High-Risk Surgical Patients: Hospital Outcome and Midterm Results.
Abdelgawad AME; Hussein MA; Naeim H; Abuelatta R; Alghamdy S
Heart Surg Forum; 2019 Aug; 22(5):E331-E339. PubMed ID: 31596707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.
Søndergaard L; Steinbrüchel DA; Ihlemann N; Nissen H; Kjeldsen BJ; Petursson P; Ngo AT; Olsen NT; Chang Y; Franzen OW; Engstrøm T; Clemmensen P; Olsen PS; Thyregod HG
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27296202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differences in left ventricular remodelling in patients with aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement with corevalve prostheses compared to surgery with porcine or bovine biological prostheses.
Ngo A; Hassager C; Thyregod HGH; Søndergaard L; Olsen PS; Steinbrüchel D; Hansen PB; Kjærgaard J; Winther-Jensen M; Ihlemann N
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 28158582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Risk.
Baron SJ; Wang K; House JA; Magnuson EA; Reynolds MR; Makkar R; Herrmann HC; Kodali S; Thourani VH; Kapadia S; Svensson L; Mack MJ; Brown DL; Russo MJ; Smith CR; Webb J; Miller C; Leon MB; Cohen DJ
Circulation; 2019 Feb; 139(7):877-888. PubMed ID: 30586747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Low-Risk Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Anantha-Narayanan M; Kandasamy VV; Reddy YN; Megaly M; Baskaran J; Pershad A; Suri RM; Garcia S
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):441-452. PubMed ID: 31678116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.
Mack MJ; Leon MB; Smith CR; Miller DC; Moses JW; Tuzcu EM; Webb JG; Douglas PS; Anderson WN; Blackstone EH; Kodali SK; Makkar RR; Fontana GP; Kapadia S; Bavaria J; Hahn RT; Thourani VH; Babaliaros V; Pichard A; Herrmann HC; Brown DL; Williams M; Akin J; Davidson MJ; Svensson LG;
Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9986):2477-84. PubMed ID: 25788234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.
Waksman R; Rogers T; Torguson R; Gordon P; Ehsan A; Wilson SR; Goncalves J; Levitt R; Hahn C; Parikh P; Bilfinger T; Butzel D; Buchanan S; Hanna N; Garrett R; Asch F; Weissman G; Ben-Dor I; Shults C; Bastian R; Craig PE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kolm P; Zou Q; Satler LF; Corso PJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 72(18):2095-2105. PubMed ID: 30170075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.
Little SH; Oh JK; Gillam L; Sengupta PP; Orsinelli DA; Cavalcante JL; Chang JD; Adams DH; Zorn GL; Pollak AW; Abdelmoneim SS; Reardon MJ; Qiao H; Popma JJ
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27313280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
