144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28571251)
1. Evaluation of Interdental Spaces of the Mandibular Posterior Area for Orthodontic Mini-Implants with Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Moslemzadeh SH; Sohrabi A; Rafighi A; Kananizadeh Y; Nourizadeh A
J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Apr; 11(4):ZC09-ZC12. PubMed ID: 28571251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim SH; Yoon HG; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Kook YA; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The anatomical evaluation of the dental arches using cone beam computed tomography--an investigation of the availability of bone for placement of mini-screws.
Pan F; Kau CH; Zhou H; Souccar N
Head Face Med; 2013 Apr; 9():13. PubMed ID: 23601073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Monnerat C; Restle L; Mucha JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of interradicular space, soft tissue, and hard tissue of the posterior palatal alveolar process for orthodontic mini-implant, using cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee JA; Ahn HW; Oh SH; Park KH; Kim SH; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Apr; 159(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33526299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional Evaluation of Interradicular Areas and Cortical Bone Thickness for Orthodontic Miniscrew Implant Placement Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Dharmadeep G; Naik MK; Reddy YM; Cheruluri S; Praveen Raj K; Reddy BR
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2020 Aug; 12(Suppl 1):S99-S104. PubMed ID: 33149438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Yang L; Li F; Cao M; Chen H; Wang X; Chen X; Yang L; Gao W; Petrone JF; Ding Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of orthodontic mini-implant placement: a CBCT study.
Kalra S; Tripathi T; Rai P; Kanase A
Prog Orthod; 2014 Nov; 15(1):61. PubMed ID: 25406652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
Park J; Cho HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Safe zones of the maxillary posterior area for mini-implant insertion in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusion].
Liao Q; Wang YJ; Zhang WY; Zhou D; Fan XP
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Aug; 27(4):370-375. PubMed ID: 30483703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Assessment of Bone Thickness in the Mandibular Anterior Region for Application of Orthodontic Mini-Screws.
Shalchi M; Kajan ZD; Shabani M; Khosravifard N; Khabbaz S; Khaksari F
Turk J Orthod; 2021 Jun; 34(2):102-108. PubMed ID: 35110158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interradicular distance and alveolar bone thickness for miniscrew insertion: a CBCT study of Persian adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns.
Golshah A; Salahshour M; Nikkerdar N
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):534. PubMed ID: 34657622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the amount of interdental bone in posterior areas of the mandible for placing orthodontic mini-implants.
Esfahanizadeh N; Shahraki D; Daneshparvar H; Talaei Pour AR; Saghiri MA; Sheibaninia A; Rashtak S
J Dent (Tehran); 2013 May; 10(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 25512751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A CBCT Assessment of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement.
Ashil AM; Sharma A; Jose LK; Grover S; Kochar AS; Varghese ST; Sharma T; Ismail PMS
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S927-S929. PubMed ID: 38595369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of mini-implant sites in the posterior maxilla using traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.
Abbassy MA; Sabban HM; Hassan AH; Zawawi KH
Saudi Med J; 2015 Nov; 36(11):1336-41. PubMed ID: 26593168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accurate pre-surgical determination for self-drilling miniscrew implant placement using surgical guides and cone-beam computed tomography.
Miyazawa K; Kawaguchi M; Tabuchi M; Goto S
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 20413451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can bone thickness and inter-radicular space affect miniscrew placement in posterior mandibular sites?
Sabec Rda C; Fernandes TM; de Lima Navarro R; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Conti AC; de Almeida MR; Poleti ML
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb; 73(2):333-9. PubMed ID: 25488308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of orthodontic tooth movement between adolescents and adults based on implant superimposition.
Ruan MJ; Chen G; Xu TM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197281. PubMed ID: 29813088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Co-axial computed tomography for optimizing orthodontic miniscrew implant size and site of placement.
Bhalla K; Kalha AS
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 23729136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Root proximity and inclination of orthodontic mini-implants after placement: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation.
Shinohara A; Motoyoshi M; Uchida Y; Shimizu N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 23810045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
