201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28571708)
1. Quality assurance of the jaws only-intensity modulated radiation therapy plans for head-and-neck cancer.
Tai DT; Son ND; Loan TTH; Anson HPW
Phys Med; 2017 Jun; 38():148-152. PubMed ID: 28571708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical introduction of a linac head-mounted 2D detector array based quality assurance system in head and neck IMRT.
Korevaar EW; Wauben DJ; van der Hulst PC; Langendijk JA; Van't Veld AA
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 21963288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of jaws-only intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
Huang SM; Gao XW; Deng XW; Wang S
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Oct; 30(10):2229-32. PubMed ID: 20965811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric-modulated arc delivery using COMPASS.
Vikraman S; Manigandan D; Karrthick KP; Sambasivaselli R; Senniandavar V; Ramu M; Rajesh T; Lutz M; Muthukumaran M; Karthikeyan N; Tejinder K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5128. PubMed ID: 25679152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.
Chen F; Rao M; Ye JS; Shepard DM; Cao D
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6106-18. PubMed ID: 22047375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification.
McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial clinical experience with ArcCHECK for IMRT/VMAT QA.
Aristophanous M; Suh Y; Chi PC; Whittlesey LJ; LaNeave S; Martel MK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):20-33. PubMed ID: 27685107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and clinical evaluation of an ionization chamber array with 3.5 mm pixel pitch for quality assurance in advanced radiotherapy techniques.
Togno M; Wilkens JJ; Menichelli D; Oechsner M; Perez-Andujar A; Morin O
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2283. PubMed ID: 27147340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical implementation and error sensitivity of a 3D quality assurance protocol for prostate and thoracic IMRT.
Gueorguiev G; Cotter C; Turcotte JC; Crawford B; Sharp G; Mah'D M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):179–192. PubMed ID: 26699299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assurance of IMRT treatment plans for a 1.5 T MR-linac using a 2D ionization chamber array and a static solid phantom.
Mönnich D; Winter J; Nachbar M; Künzel L; Boeke S; Gani C; Dohm O; Zips D; Thorwarth D
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Aug; 65(16):16NT01. PubMed ID: 32663819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.
Sun B; Rangaraj D; Boddu S; Goddu M; Yang D; Palaniswaamy G; Yaddanapudi S; Wooten O; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3837. PubMed ID: 22955649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commissioning of intensity modulated neutron radiotherapy (IMNRT).
Burmeister J; Spink R; Liang L; Bossenberger T; Halford R; Brandon J; Delauter J; Snyder M
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021718. PubMed ID: 23387741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical analysis of IMRT dosimetry quality assurance measurements for local delivery guideline.
Chung JB; Kim JS; Ha SW; Ye SJ
Radiat Oncol; 2011 Mar; 6():27. PubMed ID: 21439096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
