397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2857209)
1. Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts.
Lytle BW; Loop FD; Cosgrove DM; Ratliff NB; Easley K; Taylor PC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Feb; 89(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 2857209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angiographic studies of internal mammary artery grafts 11 years after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Ivert T; Huttunen K; Landou C; Björk VO
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Jul; 96(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 2898558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Excellent patency and growth potential of internal mammary artery grafts in pediatric coronary artery bypass surgery. New evidence for a "live" conduit.
Kitamura S; Seki T; Kawachi K; Morita R; Kawata T; Mizuguchi K; Kobayashi S; Fukutomi M; Nishii T; Kobayashi H
Circulation; 1988 Sep; 78(3 Pt 2):I129-39. PubMed ID: 3261649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radial artery bypass grafts have an increased occurrence of angiographically severe stenosis and occlusion compared with left internal mammary arteries and saphenous vein grafts.
Khot UN; Friedman DT; Pettersson G; Smedira NG; Li J; Ellis SG
Circulation; 2004 May; 109(17):2086-91. PubMed ID: 15123539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Arterial grafts do not counteract target vessel occlusion.
Bartnes K; Hermansen SE; Dahl-Eriksen Ø; Bahar R; Busund R; Sørlie DG; Myrmel T
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Nov; 44(5):e320-4. PubMed ID: 23956270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The no-touch saphenous vein as the preferred second conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting.
Dreifaldt M; Mannion JD; Bodin L; Olsson H; Zagozdzon L; Souza D
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Jul; 96(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 23684156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Sequential internal mammary artery bypass for multiple coronary stenoses].
Chauvaud S; Chachques JC; Blanchard D; Guermonprez JL; Carpentier A
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Aug; 79(9):1287-92. PubMed ID: 3101630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and angiographic assessment of complex mammary artery bypass grafting.
Rankin JS; Newman GE; Bashore TM; Muhlbaier LH; Tyson GS; Ferguson TB; Reves JG; Sabiston DC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Nov; 92(5):832-46. PubMed ID: 2877122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serial angiographic follow-up of grafts one year and five years after coronary artery bypass surgery.
Cho KR; Kim JS; Choi JS; Kim KB
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 29(4):511-6. PubMed ID: 16439151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary artery bypass grafting with the inferior epigastric artery. Midterm clinical and angiographic results.
Buche M; Schroeder E; Gurné O; Chenu P; Paquay JL; Marchandise B; Eucher P; Louagie Y; Dion R; Schoevaerdts JC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Mar; 109(3):553-9; discussion 559-60. PubMed ID: 7877318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of coronary reoperation on the survival of patients with stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts to coronary arteries.
Lytle BW; Loop FD; Taylor PC; Goormastic M; Stewart RW; Novoa R; McCarthy P; Cosgrove DM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Apr; 105(4):605-12; discussion 612-4. PubMed ID: 8468995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial.
Goldman S; Sethi GK; Holman W; Thai H; McFalls E; Ward HB; Kelly RF; Rhenman B; Tobler GH; Bakaeen FG; Huh J; Soltero E; Moursi M; Haime M; Crittenden M; Kasirajan V; Ratliff M; Pett S; Irimpen A; Gunnar W; Thomas D; Fremes S; Moritz T; Reda D; Harrison L; Wagner TH; Wang Y; Planting L; Miller M; Rodriguez Y; Juneman E; Morrison D; Pierce MK; Kreamer S; Shih MC; Lee K
JAMA; 2011 Jan; 305(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 21224458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The fate of arm veins used for aorta-coronary bypass grafts.
Stoney WS; Alford WC; Burrus GR; Glassford DM; Petracek MR; Thomas CS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Oct; 88(4):522-6. PubMed ID: 6332949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Twelve-year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass.
Barner HB; Standeven JW; Reese J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):668-75. PubMed ID: 2865410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The value of ultrafast computerized tomography in detection of the patency of coronary bypasses].
Knez A; von Smekal A; Haberl R; Spiegl F; Reichart B; Reiser M; Steinbeck G
Z Kardiol; 1996 Sep; 85(9):629-34. PubMed ID: 8992804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequential internal mammary artery grafts. Expanded utilization of an ideal conduit.
Kamath ML; Matysik LS; Schmidt DH; Smith LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Feb; 89(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 2982065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patency of internal thoracic artery grafts: comparison of right versus left and importance of vessel grafted.
Chow MS; Sim E; Orszulak TA; Schaff HV
Circulation; 1994 Nov; 90(5 Pt 2):II129-32. PubMed ID: 7955239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts.
Desai ND; Cohen EA; Naylor CD; Fremes SE;
N Engl J Med; 2004 Nov; 351(22):2302-9. PubMed ID: 15564545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of ultrafast computed tomography in the early evaluation of coronary bypass patency.
Baumgartner F; Brundage B; Bleiweis M; Lee J; Ferrario T; Georgiou D; Milliken J
Am J Card Imaging; 1996 Jul; 10(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 8914703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A patent internal mammary artery graft decreases the risk of reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery.
Velebit V; Christenson JT; Maurice J; Simonet F; Schmuziger M
Tex Heart Inst J; 1994; 21(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 7914765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
