BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28572268)

  • 41. New psychoactive substances in oral fluid of French and Belgian drivers in 2016.
    Richeval C; Wille SMR; Nachon-Phanithavong M; Samyn N; Allorge D; Gaulier JM
    Int J Drug Policy; 2018 Jul; 57():1-3. PubMed ID: 29631107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hair drug testing in the new Brazilian regulation to obtain professional driver's licence: no parallel to any other law enforcement in the world.
    Leyton V; Andreuccetti G; de Almeida RM; Muñoz DR; Walls HC; Greve JM; da Costa Montal JH; Adura FE; Yonamine M
    Addiction; 2015 Jul; 110(7):1207-8. PubMed ID: 25967396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Exploration of the longitudinal trend of DUI crashes in Pennsylvania, USA (2008 to 2019).
    Liu C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(8):593-598. PubMed ID: 34570629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Is law enforcement of drug-impaired driving cost-efficient? An explorative study of a methodology for cost-benefit analysis.
    Veisten K; Houwing S; Mathijssen MP; Akhtar J
    Int J Drug Policy; 2013 Mar; 24(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 23127668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Trends in fatal motor vehicle crashes before and after marijuana commercialization in Colorado.
    Salomonsen-Sautel S; Min SJ; Sakai JT; Thurstone C; Hopfer C
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2014 Jul; 140():137-44. PubMed ID: 24831752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. User experience and operational feasibility of four point-of-collection oral fluid drug-testing devices according to Brazilian traffic agents.
    Pechansky F; Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Roglio V; Telles YM; Silvestrin R; Pasa G; Sousa T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 30822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Roadside opioid testing of drivers using oral fluid: the case of a country with a zero tolerance law, Spain.
    Fierro I; Colás M; González-Luque JC; Álvarez FJ
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2017 May; 12(1):22. PubMed ID: 28490343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Roadside drug testing: An evaluation of the Alere DDS
    Rohrig TP; Moore CM; Stephens K; Cooper K; Coulter C; Baird T; Garnier M; Miller S; Tuyay J; Osawa K; Chou J; Nuss C; Collier J; Wittman KC
    Drug Test Anal; 2018 Apr; 10(4):663-670. PubMed ID: 28879663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Cannabis and automobile driving].
    Ménétrey A; Augsburger M; Giroud C; Mangin P
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2001 Aug; 90(34):1398-407. PubMed ID: 11552320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Driving Under the Influence of Drugs: When the Law Misses the Mark.
    Tiscione NB; Alford IK; Miller R; Shan X; Yeatman DT
    J Anal Toxicol; 2019 Mar; 43(2):138-143. PubMed ID: 30272174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Road safety implications of the partial legalisation of cannabis in Germany: protocol for a quasi-experimental study.
    Schranz A; Verthein U; Manthey J
    BMJ Open; 2024 Jun; 14(6):e084611. PubMed ID: 38871660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Correlation between oral fluid and blood THC concentration: A systematic review and discussion of policy implications.
    Robertson MB; Li A; Yuan Y; Jiang A; Gjerde H; Staples JA; Brubacher JR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Aug; 173():106694. PubMed ID: 35640367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Screening for drugs in oral fluid: illicit drug use and drug driving in a sample of Queensland motorists.
    Davey J; Leal N; Freeman J
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2007 May; 26(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 17454020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Colorado drugged driving prevalence and impaired driving conviction rates: Effects of impaired driving definitions and a 5-nanogram limit for delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol.
    Wood EC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):338-344. PubMed ID: 38175179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of alcohol and drug use by random motor vehicle drivers in Brazil and Norway.
    Gjerde H; Sousa TR; De Boni R; Christophersen AS; Limberger RP; Zancanaro I; Oiestad EL; Normann PT; Mørland J; Pechansky F
    Int J Drug Policy; 2014 May; 25(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 24613265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Challenges associated with drunk driving measurement: combining police and self-reported data to estimate an accurate prevalence in Brazil.
    Sousa T; Lunnen JC; Gonçalves V; Schmitz A; Pasa G; Bastos T; Sripad P; Chandran A; Pechansky F
    Injury; 2013 Dec; 44 Suppl 4():S11-6. PubMed ID: 24377772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of medical marijuana laws on cannabis-involved driving.
    Sevigny EL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():57-65. PubMed ID: 29885927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Drugs in oral fluid in randomly selected drivers.
    Drummer OH; Gerostamoulos D; Chu M; Swann P; Boorman M; Cairns I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Aug; 170(2-3):105-10. PubMed ID: 17658711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The impact of marijuana decriminalization on California drivers.
    Pollini RA; Romano E; Johnson MB; Lacey JH
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2015 May; 150():135-40. PubMed ID: 25765482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Laboratory evaluation and field application of roadside oral fluid collectors and drug testing devices.
    Crouch DJ; Walsh JM; Cangianelli L; Quintela O
    Ther Drug Monit; 2008 Apr; 30(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 18367979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.