These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28573526)

  • 1. Selecting embryos with the highest implantation potential using data mining and decision tree based on classical embryo morphology and morphokinetics.
    Carrasco B; Arroyo G; Gil Y; Gómez MJ; Rodríguez I; Barri PN; Veiga A; Boada M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Aug; 34(8):983-990. PubMed ID: 28573526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-lapse deselection model for human day 3 in vitro fertilization embryos: the combination of qualitative and quantitative measures of embryo growth.
    Liu Y; Chapple V; Feenan K; Roberts P; Matson P
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):656-662.e1. PubMed ID: 26616439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the addition of time-lapse morphokinetics in the selection of embryos for transfer improve pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial.
    Goodman LR; Goldberg J; Falcone T; Austin C; Desai N
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):275-85.e10. PubMed ID: 26522611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.
    Petersen BM; Boel M; Montag M; Gardner DK
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2231-44. PubMed ID: 27609980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Morphokinetic analysis of human embryo development and its relationship to the female age: a retrospective time-lapse imaging study.
    Akhter N; Shahab M
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2017 Aug; 63(8):84-92. PubMed ID: 28886319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.
    Motato Y; de los Santos MJ; Escriba MJ; Ruiz BA; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):376-84.e9. PubMed ID: 26598211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External validation of a time-lapse model; a retrospective study comparing embryo evaluation using a morphokinetic model to standard morphology with live birth as endpoint.
    Adolfsson E; Porath S; Andershed AN
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Sep; 22(3):205-214. PubMed ID: 29932617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation.
    Aparicio-Ruiz B; Basile N; Pérez Albalá S; Bronet F; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1379-1385.e10. PubMed ID: 27530063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of morphokinetics and morphological dynamics of cleavage stage on embryo developmental potential: A time-lapse study.
    Yang SH; Wu CH; Chen YC; Yang CK; Wu TH; Chen PC; Tsai HD
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 29458909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the efficacy of six published time-lapse imaging embryo selection algorithms to predict implantation to demonstrate the need for the development of specific, in-house morphokinetic selection algorithms.
    Barrie A; Homburg R; McDowell G; Brown J; Kingsland C; Troup S
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):613-621. PubMed ID: 28069186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of high potential embryos using time-lapse imaging: the era of morphokinetics.
    Herrero J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1030-4. PubMed ID: 23395415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection of human blastocysts with a high implantation potential based on timely compaction.
    Mizobe Y; Ezono Y; Tokunaga M; Oya N; Iwakiri R; Yoshida N; Sato Y; Onoue N; Miyoshi K
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Aug; 34(8):991-997. PubMed ID: 28573523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.
    Minasi MG; Colasante A; Riccio T; Ruberti A; Casciani V; Scarselli F; Spinella F; Fiorentino F; Varricchio MT; Greco E
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2245-54. PubMed ID: 27591227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation into the effect of potential confounding patient and treatment parameters on human embryo morphokinetics.
    Barrie A; McDowell G; Troup S
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Apr; 115(4):1014-1022. PubMed ID: 33461751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro maturation is associated with increased early embryo arrest without impairing morphokinetic development of useable embryos progressing to blastocysts.
    Walls ML; Ryan JP; Keelan JA; Hart R
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1842-9. PubMed ID: 26040479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does sperm origin-Ejaculated or testicular-Affect embryo morphokinetic parameters?
    Karavani G; Kan-Tor Y; Schachter-Safrai N; Levitas E; Or Y; Ben-Meir A; Buxboim A; Har-Vardi I
    Andrology; 2021 Mar; 9(2):632-639. PubMed ID: 33251758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Morphology vs morphokinetics: a retrospective comparison of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists on blastocysts with known implantation outcome.
    Adolfsson E; Andershed AN
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Sep; 22(3):228-237. PubMed ID: 29912521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection.
    Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Palao L; Witmer J; Palao LM; Gvakharia M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):369-75.e6. PubMed ID: 26604069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional morphology performs better than morphokinetics for prediction of live birth after day 2 transfer.
    Ahlstrom A; Park H; Bergh C; Selleskog U; Lundin K
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2016 Jul; 33(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 27090968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of morphokinetic parameters to select all embryos with full capacity to implant.
    Chamayou S; Patrizio P; Storaci G; Tomaselli V; Alecci C; Ragolia C; Crescenzo C; Guglielmino A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2013 Jun; 30(5):703-10. PubMed ID: 23585186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.