These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28573919)

  • 1. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity score matching after multiple imputation when a confounder has missing data.
    Ségalas C; Leyrat C; Carpenter JR; Williamson E
    Stat Med; 2023 Mar; 42(7):1082-1095. PubMed ID: 36695043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of different methods to handle missing data in the context of propensity score analysis.
    Choi J; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 34(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 30341708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple imputation for propensity score analysis with covariates missing at random: some clarity on within and across methods.
    Nguyen TQ; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38863120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Avoiding pitfalls when combining multiple imputation and propensity scores.
    Granger E; Sergeant JC; Lunt M
    Stat Med; 2019 Nov; 38(26):5120-5132. PubMed ID: 31512265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Missing confounding data in marginal structural models: a comparison of inverse probability weighting and multiple imputation.
    Moodie EE; Delaney JA; Lefebvre G; Platt RW
    Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 13. PubMed ID: 22462119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.
    Qu Y; Lipkovich I
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1402-14. PubMed ID: 19222021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation in Cox model with missing failure subtype.
    Guo F; Langworthy B; Ogino S; Wang M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Feb; 33(2):344-356. PubMed ID: 38262434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome-sensitive multiple imputation: a simulation study.
    Kontopantelis E; White IR; Sperrin M; Buchan I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 28068910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation.
    Vader DT; Mamtani R; Li Y; Griffith SD; Calip GS; Hubbard RA
    Epidemiology; 2023 Jul; 34(4):520-530. PubMed ID: 37155612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure.
    Coffman DL; Zhou J; Cai X
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):168. PubMed ID: 32586271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.
    Turner EL; Yao L; Li F; Prague M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1338-1353. PubMed ID: 31293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity Score Weighting with Missing Data on Covariates and Clustered Data Structure.
    Liu X
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(3):411-433. PubMed ID: 38379305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation.
    Mitra R; Reiter JP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):188-204. PubMed ID: 22687877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of multiple imputation approaches for handling missing covariate information in a case-cohort study with a binary outcome.
    Middleton M; Nguyen C; Moreno-Betancur M; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 35369860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining multiple imputation and inverse-probability weighting.
    Seaman SR; White IR; Copas AJ; Li L
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 22050039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the multiple imputation variance estimator for control-based and delta-adjusted pattern mixture models.
    Tang Y
    Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1379-1387. PubMed ID: 28407203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple-Imputation Variance Estimation in Studies With Missing or Misclassified Inclusion Criteria.
    Giganti MJ; Shepherd BE
    Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Dec; 189(12):1628-1632. PubMed ID: 32685964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining multiple imputation and meta-analysis with individual participant data.
    Burgess S; White IR; Resche-Rigon M; Wood AM
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4499-514. PubMed ID: 23703895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development and validation of prognostic models for overall survival in the presence of missing data in the training dataset: a strategy with a detailed example.
    Royle KL; Cairns DA
    Diagn Progn Res; 2021 Aug; 5(1):14. PubMed ID: 34344484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 56.