These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28575731)

  • 1. Empirical test of the performance of an acoustic-phonetic approach to forensic voice comparison under conditions similar to those of a real case.
    Enzinger E; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():30-40. PubMed ID: 28575731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison.
    Morrison GS
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 24796954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of relevant data, quantitative measurements, and statistical models to calculate a likelihood ratio for a Chinese forensic voice comparison case involving two sisters.
    Zhang C; Morrison GS; Enzinger E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():115-124. PubMed ID: 27592142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of human-supervised formant-trajectory measurement for forensic voice comparison.
    Zhang C; Morrison GS; Ochoa F; Enzinger E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL54-60. PubMed ID: 23298018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. INTERPOL survey of the use of speaker identification by law enforcement agencies.
    Morrison GS; Sahito FH; Jardine G; Djokic D; Clavet S; Berghs S; Goemans Dorny C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():92-100. PubMed ID: 27100858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system.
    Morrison GS; Zhang C; Rose P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):59-65. PubMed ID: 21131149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speaker identification in courtroom contexts - Part III: Groups of collaborating listeners compared to forensic voice comparison based on automatic-speaker-recognition technology.
    Bali AS; Basu N; Weber P; Rosas-Aguilar C; Edmond G; Martire KA; Morrison GS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112048. PubMed ID: 38733653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case.
    Enzinger E; Morrison GS; Ochoa F
    Sci Justice; 2016 Jan; 56(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 26746825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Issues in forensic voice.
    Hollien H; Huntley Bahr R; Harnsberger JD
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):170-84. PubMed ID: 24176301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic-phonetic features for the automatic classification of fricatives.
    Ali AM; Van der Spiegel J; Mueller P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2217-35. PubMed ID: 11386573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The sources of identification signs for the forensic medical personality identification from voice and sounding speech].
    Kaganov ASh
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2012; 55(6):20-4. PubMed ID: 23405464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Euclidean Distances as measures of speaker similarity including identical twin pairs: A forensic investigation using source and filter voice characteristics.
    San Segundo E; Tsanas A; Gómez-Vilda P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():25-38. PubMed ID: 27912151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The possibilities for the use of the spectral analysis to overcome the incompatibility of the speech materials for the purpose of medical criminalistic identification of the speaker].
    Kir'yanov PA; Kaganov AS
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2017; 60(4):25-28. PubMed ID: 28766525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forensic facial comparison: issues of admissibility in the development of novel analytical technique.
    Mallett X; Evison MP
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 23718761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vocal Features: From Voice Identification to Speech Recognition by Machine.
    Li X; Mills M
    Technol Cult; 2019; 60(2S):S129-S160. PubMed ID: 31231075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phonetic considerations in the design of voice assessment material.
    Abberton E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2005; 30(3-4):175-80. PubMed ID: 16287659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Approach to Speaker Identification.
    Hollien H
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):334-344. PubMed ID: 27404606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The case for aural perceptual speaker identification.
    Hollien H; Didla G; Harnsberger JD; Hollien KA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Dec; 269():8-20. PubMed ID: 27855301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The possibilities and limitations of the methods for the personality identification from the voice and sounding speech characteristics].
    Kir'yanov PA
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2015; 58(4):32-36. PubMed ID: 26521314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.