BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28576421)

  • 1. [Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins].
    Roux V; Eyraud R; Brureau L; Gourtaud G; Senechal C; Fofana M; Blanchet P
    Prog Urol; 2017; 27(8-9):467-473. PubMed ID: 28576421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in an Afro-Caribbean population in Guadeloupe (French West Indies).
    Brureau L; Emeville E; Multigner L; Blanchet P
    Prog Urol; 2018 Jun; 28(8-9):442-449. PubMed ID: 29789237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.
    Leite KR; Hartmann C; Reis ST; Viana N; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Anna AC; Nesrallah A; Nesrallah L; Antunes AA; Camara-Lopes LH; Srougi M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 24856481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Fossati N; Karnes RJ; Cozzarini C; Fiorino C; Gandaglia G; Joniau S; Boorjian SA; Goldner G; Hinkelbein W; Haustermans K; Tombal B; Shariat S; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):728-733. PubMed ID: 26497924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The outcome of patients with pathological Gleason score >or=8 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Rodriguez-Covarrubias F; Larre S; De La Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17941921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive factors associated with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for pathological T2 prostate cancer with negative surgical margins.
    Aoun F; Albisinni S; Henriet B; Tombal B; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T
    Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27910728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
    Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.
    Huang JG; Pedersen J; Hong MK; Harewood LM; Peters J; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 23350712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute.
    Guillonneau B; el-Fettouh H; Baumert H; Cathelineau X; Doublet JD; Fromont G; Vallancien G
    J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1261-6. PubMed ID: 12629339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L
    Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
    BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic value of seminal vesicle involvement due to prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Algarra R; Barba J; Merino I; Tienza A; Tolosa E; Robles JE; Zudaire J
    Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Apr; 39(3):144-53. PubMed ID: 24996780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.