These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28577313)

  • 1. A Nanofiltration Decision Tool for Potable Reuse: A New Rejection Model for Recalcitrant CECs.
    Jones SM; Watts MJ; Wickramasinghe SR
    Water Environ Res; 2017 Nov; 89(11):1942-1951. PubMed ID: 28577313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Boron Can Be Used to Predict Trace Organic Rejection through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(23):13871-13878. PubMed ID: 30444356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Viability of a low-pressure nanofilter in treating recycled water for water reuse applications: a pilot-scale study.
    Bellona C; Drewes JE
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3948-58. PubMed ID: 17582458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Functional Chemistry on the Rejection of Low-Molecular Weight Neutral Organics through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Oct; 53(19):11401-11409. PubMed ID: 31513383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A taxonomy of chemicals of emerging concern based on observed fate at water resource recovery facilities.
    Jones SM; Chowdhury ZK; Watts MJ
    Chemosphere; 2017 Mar; 170():153-160. PubMed ID: 27987463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of reverse osmosis membrane age on rejection of NDMA precursors and formation of NDMA in finished water after full advanced treatment for potable reuse.
    Roback SL; Ishida KP; Plumlee MH
    Chemosphere; 2019 Oct; 233():120-131. PubMed ID: 31170582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cyclophosphamide removal from water by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane.
    Wang L; Albasi C; Faucet-Marquis V; Pfohl-Leszkowicz A; Dorandeu C; Marion B; Causserand C
    Water Res; 2009 Sep; 43(17):4115-22. PubMed ID: 19592068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High rejection reverse osmosis membrane for removal of N-nitrosamines and their precursors.
    Fujioka T; Ishida KP; Shintani T; Kodamatani H
    Water Res; 2018 Mar; 131():45-51. PubMed ID: 29268083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
    Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
    Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
    Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
    Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nutrient removal by NF and RO membranes in a decentralized sanitation system.
    van Voorthuizen EM; Zwijnenburg A; Wessling M
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(15):3657-67. PubMed ID: 16054670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of commercial nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane filtration to remove per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effects of transmembrane pressures and water matrices.
    Ma Q; Lei Q; Liu F; Song Z; Khusid B; Zhang W
    Water Environ Res; 2024 Feb; 96(2):e10983. PubMed ID: 38291820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contaminants of emerging concern in reverse osmosis brine concentrate from indirect/direct water reuse applications.
    Romeyn TR; Harijanto W; Sandoval S; Delagah S; Sharbatmaleki M
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(2):236-50. PubMed ID: 26819378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry.
    Ben Amar N; Kechaou N; Palmeri J; Deratani A; Sghaier A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19497667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.