128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28577420)
1. Reliability of point-of-collection testing devices for drugs of abuse in oral fluid: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Scherer JN; Fiorentin TR; Borille BT; Pasa G; Sousa TRV; von Diemen L; Limberger RP; Pechansky F
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2017 Sep; 143():77-85. PubMed ID: 28577420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analytical reliability of four oral fluid point-of-collection testing devices for drug detection in drivers.
Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Rabelo-da-Ponte FD; Silvestrin R; Ornell R; Sousa T; Limberger RP; Pechansky F
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110434. PubMed ID: 32758788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oral Fluid Testing for Cocaine: Analytical Evaluation of Two Point-of-Collection Drug Screening Devices.
Scherer JN; Fiorentin TR; Sousa TRV; Limberger RP; Pechansky F
J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jun; 41(5):392-398. PubMed ID: 28334841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse.
Bosker WM; Huestis MA
Clin Chem; 2009 Nov; 55(11):1910-31. PubMed ID: 19745062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of selected oral fluid point-of-collection drug-testing devices.
Crouch DJ; Walsh JM; Flegel R; Cangianelli L; Baudys J; Atkins R
J Anal Toxicol; 2005; 29(4):244-8. PubMed ID: 15975256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Roadside oral fluid testing: comparison of the results of drugwipe 5 and drugwipe benzodiazepines on-site tests with laboratory confirmation results of oral fluid and whole blood.
Pehrsson A; Gunnar T; Engblom C; Seppä H; Jama A; Lillsunde P
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):140-8. PubMed ID: 17640837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An analytical evaluation of eight on-site oral fluid drug screening devices using laboratory confirmation results from oral fluid.
Blencowe T; Pehrsson A; Lillsunde P; Vimpari K; Houwing S; Smink B; Mathijssen R; Van der Linden T; Legrand SA; Pil K; Verstraete A
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 21183299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. User experience and operational feasibility of four point-of-collection oral fluid drug-testing devices according to Brazilian traffic agents.
Pechansky F; Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Roglio V; Telles YM; Silvestrin R; Pasa G; Sousa T
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 30822144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory evaluation and field application of roadside oral fluid collectors and drug testing devices.
Crouch DJ; Walsh JM; Cangianelli L; Quintela O
Ther Drug Monit; 2008 Apr; 30(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 18367979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of ten oral fluid point-of-collection drug-testing devices.
Walsh JM; Crouch DJ; Danaceau JP; Cangianelli L; Liddicoat L; Adkins R
J Anal Toxicol; 2007; 31(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 17389083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of commercial multi-drug oral fluid devices to identify 39 new amphetamine-designer drugs.
Nieddu M; Burrai L; Trignano C; Boatto G
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2014 Mar; 16(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 24360925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Illicit Drugs in Oral Fluid: Evaluation of Two Collection Devices.
Cohier C; Mégarbane B; Roussel O
J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 41(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27681339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oral Fluid Drug Testing: Analytical Approaches, Issues and Interpretation of Results.
Desrosiers NA; Huestis MA
J Anal Toxicol; 2019 Jul; 43(6):415-443. PubMed ID: 31263897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices in normal police procedure in Germany.
Musshoff F; Hokamp EG; Bott U; Madea B
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():120-4. PubMed ID: 24699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of psychoactive substances by goods carriage drivers associated with Kerala, India.
Siva Prasad MS; Priyatha CV; K Joseph J; Aneesh EM
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(8):663-669. PubMed ID: 37603111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of three rapid oral fluid test devices on the screening of multiple drugs of abuse including ketamine.
Tang MHY; Ching CK; Poon S; Chan SSS; Ng WY; Lam M; Wong CK; Pao R; Lau A; Mak TWL
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 May; 286():113-120. PubMed ID: 29574346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The recovery of illicit drugs from oral fluid sampling devices.
Dickson S; Park A; Nolan S; Kenworthy S; Nicholson C; Midgley J; Pinfold R; Hampton S
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 16621382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of on-site oral fluid screening using Drugwipe-5(+), RapidSTAT and Drug Test 5000 for the detection of drugs of abuse in drivers.
Wille SM; Samyn N; Ramírez-Fernández Mdel M; De Boeck G
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 May; 198(1-3):2-6. PubMed ID: 19913376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Drugs of abuse in oral fluid collected by two different sample kits--stability testing and validation using ultra performance tandem mass spectrometry analysis.
Lund HM; Øiestad EL; Gjerde H; Christophersen AS
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 879(30):3367-77. PubMed ID: 21962269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field Detection of Drugs of Abuse in Oral Fluid Using the Alere™ DDS®2 Mobile Test System with Confirmation by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Krotulski AJ; Mohr ALA; Friscia M; Logan BK
J Anal Toxicol; 2018 Apr; 42(3):170-176. PubMed ID: 29301050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
