These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28577420)

  • 21. Prescription and illicit psychoactive drugs in oral fluid--LC-MS/MS method development and analysis of samples from Brazilian drivers.
    Zancanaro I; Limberger RP; Bohel PO; dos Santos MK; De Boni RB; Pechansky F; Caldas ED
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Nov; 223(1-3):208-16. PubMed ID: 23000138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stability of drugs of abuse in oral fluid collection devices with purpose of external quality assessment schemes.
    Ventura M; Pichini S; Ventura R; Leal S; Zuccaro P; Pacifici R; de la Torre R
    Ther Drug Monit; 2009 Apr; 31(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 19307939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of drug concentrations between whole blood and oral fluid.
    Langel K; Gjerde H; Favretto D; Lillsunde P; Øiestad EL; Ferrara SD; Verstraete AG
    Drug Test Anal; 2014 May; 6(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 24039237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determination of illicit drugs and metabolites in oral fluid by microextraction on packed sorbent coupled with LC-MS/MS.
    Montesano C; Simeoni MC; Curini R; Sergi M; Lo Sterzo C; Compagnone D
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 May; 407(13):3647-58. PubMed ID: 25772560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of programmable bio-nano-chip system for the quantitative detection of drugs of abuse in oral fluids.
    Christodoulides N; De La Garza R; Simmons GW; McRae MP; Wong J; Newton TF; Smith R; Mahoney JJ; Hohenstein J; Gomez S; Floriano PN; Talavera H; Sloan DJ; Moody DE; Andrenyak DM; Kosten TR; Haque A; McDevitt JT
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2015 Aug; 153():306-13. PubMed ID: 26048639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New technology and new initiatives in U.S. workplace testing.
    Walsh JM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jan; 174(2-3):120-4. PubMed ID: 17434275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychoactive substances in seriously injured drivers in Denmark.
    Wiese Simonsen K; Steentoft A; Bernhoft IM; Hels T; Rasmussen BS; Linnet K
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jan; 224(1-3):44-50. PubMed ID: 23142064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prevalence of psychoactive substances in truck drivers in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region (France).
    Labat L; Fontaine B; Delzenne C; Doublet A; Marek MC; Tellier D; Tonneau M; Lhermitte M; Frimat P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jan; 174(2-3):90-4. PubMed ID: 17418990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of 21 drugs in oral fluid using fully automated supported liquid extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS.
    Valen A; Leere Øiestad ÅM; Strand DH; Skari R; Berg T
    Drug Test Anal; 2017 May; 9(5):808-823. PubMed ID: 27464485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Urine drug testing results and paired oral fluid comparison from patients enrolled in long-term medication-assisted treatment in Tennessee.
    Miller KL; Puet BL; Roberts A; Hild C; Carter J; Black DL
    J Subst Abuse Treat; 2017 May; 76():36-42. PubMed ID: 28131519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Whether drug detection in urine and oral fluid is similar? A systematic review.
    Martini MBA; Batista TBD; Henn IW; Souza PTDR; Vieira AR; Azevedo-Alanis LR
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2020 Apr; 50(4):348-358. PubMed ID: 32343161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Drugged Driving in Wisconsin: Oral Fluid Versus Blood.
    Edwards LD; Smith KL; Savage T
    J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 41(6):523-529. PubMed ID: 28830121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Oral Fluid vs. Urine Analysis to Monitor Synthetic Cannabinoids and Classic Drugs Recent Exposure.
    Blandino V; Wetzel J; Kim J; Haxhi P; Curtis R; Concheiro M
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2017; 18(10):796-805. PubMed ID: 29173162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the IDS One-Step ELISA kits for the detection of illicit drugs in hair.
    Pujol ML; Cirimele V; Tritsch PJ; Villain M; Kintz P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Aug; 170(2-3):189-92. PubMed ID: 17628371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Oral fluid drug analysis in the age of new psychoactive substances.
    Øiestad EL; Øiestad ÅM; Gjelstad A; Karinen R
    Bioanalysis; 2016 Apr; 8(7):691-710. PubMed ID: 26964619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Current developments in drug testing in oral fluid.
    Pil K; Verstraete A
    Ther Drug Monit; 2008 Apr; 30(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 18367980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Review: Pharmacokinetics of illicit drugs in oral fluid.
    Drummer OH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jun; 150(2-3):133-42. PubMed ID: 15944053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Drug analytics in oral fluid using immunoassay].
    Dierich O; Soyka M
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2005 Jul; 73(7):401-8. PubMed ID: 16012919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimization and validation of CEDIA drugs of abuse immunoassay tests in serum on Hitachi 912.
    Kirschbaum KM; Musshoff F; Schmithausen R; Stockhausen S; Madea B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):252-5. PubMed ID: 21775079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The U.S. Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs: current status and future considerations.
    Bush DM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jan; 174(2-3):111-9. PubMed ID: 17434274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.