752 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28577544)
1. Deactivation vs. asynchronous pacing - prospective evaluation of a protocol for rhythm management in patients with magnetic resonance conditional pacemakers undergoing adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Klein-Wiele O; Garmer M; Barbone G; Urbien R; Busch M; Kara K; Schäfer H; Schulte-Hermes M; Hailer B; Grönemeyer D
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jun; 17(1):142. PubMed ID: 28577544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility and safety of adenosine cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with MR conditional pacemaker systems at 1.5 Tesla.
Klein-Wiele O; Garmer M; Urbien R; Busch M; Kara K; Mateiescu S; Grönemeyer D; Schulte-Hermes M; Garbrecht M; Hailer B
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Dec; 17():112. PubMed ID: 26695427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with magnetic resonance conditional pacemaker systems at 1.5 T: influence of pacemaker related artifacts on image quality including first pass perfusion, aortic and mitral valve assessment, flow measurement, short tau inversion recovery and T1-weighted imaging.
Klein-Wiele O; Garmer M; Busch M; Mateiescu S; Urbien R; Barbone G; Kara K; Schulte-Hermes M; Metz F; Hailer B; Grönemeyer D
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Mar; 33(3):383-394. PubMed ID: 27815793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of arrhythmia on diagnostic performance of adenosine stress CMR in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease.
Greulich S; Steubing H; Birkmeier S; Grün S; Bentz K; Sechtem U; Mahrholdt H
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Nov; 17():94. PubMed ID: 26541808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility and safety of high-dose adenosine perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Karamitsos TD; Ntusi NA; Francis JM; Holloway CJ; Myerson SG; Neubauer S
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Nov; 12(1):66. PubMed ID: 21080924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of stress perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance in follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions of the left main coronary artery.
Nanni S; Lovato L; Ghetti G; Vagnarelli F; Mineo G; Fattori R; Saia F; Marzocchi A; Marrozzini C; Zompatori M; Reggiani LB; Semprini F; Melandri G; Biagini E; Corsini A; Norscini G; Rapezzi C
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1589-1597. PubMed ID: 28455632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Myocardial fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myotonic muscular dystrophy type 1: highly prevalent but not associated with surface conduction abnormality.
Cardona A; Arnold WD; Kissel JT; Raman SV; Zareba KM
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 May; 21(1):26. PubMed ID: 31046780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The PhysioVP-AF study, a randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical benefit of physiological ventricular pacing vs. managed ventricular pacing for persistent atrial fibrillation prevention in patients with prolonged atrioventricular conduction: design and rationale.
Pastore G; Bertini M; Bonanno C; Coluccia G; Dell'Era G; De Mattia L; Grieco D; Katsouras G; Maines M; Marcantoni L; Marinaccio L; Paglino G; Palmisano P; Ziacchi M; Zoppo F; Noventa F
Europace; 2023 May; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 36974970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode.
Nitardy A; Langreck H; Dietz R; Stockburger M
Clin Res Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 98(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18853096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in patients with MR-conditional transvenous permanent pacemakers and defibrillators.
Pavon AG; Porretta AP; Arangalage D; Domenichini G; Rutz T; Hugelshofer S; Pruvot E; Monney P; Pascale P; Schwitter J
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2022 Jan; 24(1):9. PubMed ID: 35022037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Results of long-term permanent atrial stimulation in sick sinus disease].
Goicolea de Oro A; Bescós LL; Pastor Fuentes A; Esteban Paúl E; Kallmeyer Martín C; Chicote Ramos R
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 50(7):474-9. PubMed ID: 9304174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety, feasibility, and prognostic value of stress perfusion CMR in patients with MR-conditional pacemaker.
Pezel T; Lacotte J; Horvilleur J; Toupin S; Hovasse T; Unterseeh T; Sanguineti F; Said MA; Salerno F; Fiorina L; Manenti V; Zouaghi A; Faradji A; Nicol M; Ah-Sing T; Dillinger JG; Henry P; Garot P; Bousson V; Garot J
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Jan; 24(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 36214336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with MR-conditional pacemakers.
Raphael CE; Vassiliou V; Alpendurada F; Prasad SK; Pennell DJ; Mohiaddin RH
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 17(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26588986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance accurately detects obstructive coronary artery disease in suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a sub-analysis of the CARMENTA Trial.
van Cauteren YJM; Smulders MW; Theunissen RALJ; Gerretsen SC; Adriaans BP; Bijvoet GP; Mingels AMA; van Kuijk SMJ; Schalla S; Crijns HJGM; Kim RJ; Wildberger JE; Heijman J; Bekkers SCAM
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Mar; 23(1):40. PubMed ID: 33752696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodynamic response and safety of vasodilator stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with permanent pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
Miller L; Airapetov S; Pillai A; Kalahasty G; Ellenbogen KA; Gregory Hundley W; Trankle CR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2127-2135. PubMed ID: 35842792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction.
Velayuthan R; Sukumar SK; Bootla D; Balaguru S; Anantharaj A; Satheesh S; Selvaraj RJ
Indian Heart J; 2024; 76(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 38070672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of pacemaker automatic capture management and atrioventricular interval extension algorithm.
Chen KP; Xu G; Wu S; Tang B; Wang L; Zhang S;
Europace; 2013 Mar; 15(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 23243132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using wideband sequences in patients with nonconditional cardiac implanted electronic devices.
Do DH; Eyvazian V; Bayoneta AJ; Hu P; Finn JP; Bradfield JS; Shivkumar K; Boyle NG
Heart Rhythm; 2018 Feb; 15(2):218-225. PubMed ID: 29017930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study.
Chen S; Chen K; Tao Q; Zheng L; Shen F; Wu S; Fan J; Xu G; Wang L; Zhou X; Zhang S;
Europace; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1595-602. PubMed ID: 24706091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
