These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28577684)

  • 1. Electronically self-assessed functional capacity and exercise testing: A comparison of the Duke Activity Status Index and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System tools.
    Coute RA; Ehrenfeld JM; Gupta DK; Terekhov MA; Wanderer JP
    Am Heart J; 2017 Jun; 188():82-86. PubMed ID: 28577684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical role of the Duke Activity Status Index in the selection of the optimal type of stress myocardial perfusion imaging study in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease.
    Phillips L; Wang JW; Pfeffer B; Gianos E; Fisher D; Shaw LJ; Mieres JH
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1015-20. PubMed ID: 21971704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usefulness of the Duke Activity Status Index to Select an Optimal Cardiovascular Exercise Stress Test Protocol.
    Canada JM; Reynolds MA; Myers R; West J; Sweat K; Powell C; McGhee V; Kontos MC; Bhardwaj H; Abbate A; Arena R; Hundley WG
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 May; 146():107-114. PubMed ID: 33539859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of estimated functional capacity in estimating outcome: results from the NHBLI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study.
    Shaw LJ; Olson MB; Kip K; Kelsey SF; Johnson BD; Mark DB; Reis SE; Mankad S; Rogers WJ; Pohost GM; Arant CB; Wessel TR; Chaitman BR; Sopko G; Handberg E; Pepine CJ; Bairey Merz CN
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 47(3 Suppl):S36-43. PubMed ID: 16458169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Significant discrepancies exist between clinician assessment and patient self-assessment of functional capacity by validated scoring tools during preoperative evaluation.
    Stokes JW; Wanderer JP; McEvoy MD
    Perioper Med (Lond); 2016; 5():18. PubMed ID: 27413530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simplified (modified) Duke Activity Status Index (M-DASI) to characterise functional capacity: a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study.
    Riedel B; Li MH; Lee CHA; Ismail H; Cuthbertson BH; Wijeysundera DN; Ho KM;
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Jan; 126(1):181-190. PubMed ID: 32690247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical activity and functional capacity measurement in women: a report from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE study.
    Bairey Merz CN; Olson M; McGorray S; Pakstis DL; Zell K; Rickens CR; Kelsey SF; Bittner V; Sharaf BL; Sopko G
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 Sep; 9(7):769-77. PubMed ID: 11025869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of the Duke Activity Status Index into preoperative risk evaluation: a multicentre prospective cohort study.
    Wijeysundera DN; Beattie WS; Hillis GS; Abbott TEF; Shulman MA; Ackland GL; Mazer CD; Myles PS; Pearse RM; Cuthbertson BH; ; Myles PS; Shulman MA; Wallace S; Farrington C; Thompson B; Ellis M; Borg B; Kerridge RK; Douglas J; Brannan J; Pretto J; Godsall MG; Beauchamp N; Allen S; Kennedy A; Wright E; Malherbe J; Ismail H; Riedel B; Melville A; Sivakumar H; Murmane A; Kenchington K; Kirabiyik Y; Gurunathan U; Stonell C; Brunello K; Steele K; Tronstad O; Masel P; Dent A; Smith E; Bodger A; Abolfathi M; Sivalingam P; Hall A; Painter TW; Macklin S; Elliott A; Carrera AM; Terblanche NCS; Pitt S; Samuels J; Wilde C; Leslie K; MacCormick A; Bramley D; Southcott AM; Grant J; Taylor H; Bates S; Towns M; Tippett A; Marshall F; Mazer CD; Kunasingam J; Yagnik A; Crescini C; Yagnik S; McCartney CJL; Choi S; Somascanthan P; Flores K; Wijeysundera DN; Beattie WS; Karkouti K; Clarke HA; Jerath A; McCluskey SA; Wasowicz M; Granton JT; Day L; Pazmino-Canizares J; Oh P; Belliard R; Lee L; Dobson K; Chan V; Brull R; Ami N; Stanbrook M; Hagen K; Campbell D; Short T; Van Der Westhuizen J; Higgie K; Lindsay H; Jang R; Wong C; Mcallister D; Ali M; Kumar J; Waymouth E; Kim C; Dimech J; Lorimer M; Tai J; Miller R; Sara R; Collingwood A; Olliff S; Gabriel S; Houston H; Dalley P; Hurford S; Hunt A; Andrews L; Navarra L; Jason-Smith A; Thompson H; McMillan N; Back G; Croal BL; Lum M; Martin D; James S; Filipe H; Pinto M; Kynaston S; Pearse RM; Abbott TEF; Phull M; Beilstein C; Bodger P; Everingham K; Hu Y; Niebrzegowska E; Corriea C; Creary T; Januszewska M; Ahmad T; Whalley J; Haslop R; McNeil J; Brown A; MacDonald N; Pakats M; Greaves K; Jhanji S; Raobaikady R; Black E; Rooms M; Lawrence H; Koutra M; Pirie K; Gertsman M; Jack S; Celinski M; Levett D; Edwards M; Salmon K; Bolger C; Loughney L; Seaward L; Collins H; Tyrell B; Tantony N; Golder K; Ackland GL; Stephens RCM; Gallego-Paredes L; Reyes A; Gutierrez Del Arroyo A; Raj A; Lifford R; ; ; ; ;
    Br J Anaesth; 2020 Mar; 124(3):261-270. PubMed ID: 31864719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Criterion validity of the Duke Activity Status Index for assessing functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Carter R; Holiday DB; Grothues C; Nwasuruba C; Stocks J; Tiep B
    J Cardiopulm Rehabil; 2002; 22(4):298-308. PubMed ID: 12202852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of metabolic equivalents (METs) by the MET-REPAIR questionnaire: A validation study in patients with a high cardiovascular burden.
    Jaeger C; Burkard T; Kamber F; Seeberger E; Bolliger D; Pfister O; Buse GL; Mauermann E
    J Clin Anesth; 2022 Feb; 76():110559. PubMed ID: 34687977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thresholds of functional capacity using the four-question (modified) Duke Activity Status Index (M-DASI-4Q) as a screening tool: observations from the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance Before Surgery (METS) study.
    Lee CHA; Ismail H; Ho KM; Riedel B; Schier R
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Mar; 126(3):e92-e94. PubMed ID: 33341224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Duke Activity Status Index with cardiopulmonary exercise testing in cancer patients.
    Li MH; Bolshinsky V; Ismail H; Ho KM; Heriot A; Riedel B
    J Anesth; 2018 Aug; 32(4):576-584. PubMed ID: 29845328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring functional status of chronic coronary patients. Reliability, validity and responsiveness to clinical change of the reduced version of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI).
    Alonso J; Permanyer-Miralda G; Cascant P; Brotons C; Prieto L; Soler-Soler J
    Eur Heart J; 1997 Mar; 18(3):414-9. PubMed ID: 9076377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Patients With Articular Cartilage Defects of the Knee.
    Shamrock AG; Wolf BR; Ortiz SF; Duchman KR; Bollier MJ; Carender CN; Westermann RW
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Feb; 36(2):516-520. PubMed ID: 31901394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometric testing of the Duke Activity Status Index in patients with heart failure.
    Fan X; Lee KS; Frazier SK; Lennie TA; Moser DK
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2015 Jun; 14(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 24504873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) in predicting ischaemia in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy - a prospective study.
    George MJ; Kasbekar SA; Bhagawati D; Hall M; Buscombe JR
    Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2010; 13(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 21598228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing and Validating a Novel Tool to Enhance Functional Status Assessment: The Tennessee Functional Status Questionnaire (TFSQ).
    Vanterpool SG; Heidel RE; Snyder K; Keil T; Contreras C; Hartman A; Higdon R; Jeter J
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2023 Feb; 36(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 36707242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overestimation of aerobic capacity with the bruce treadmill protocol in patients being assessed for suspected myocardial ischemia.
    Pinkstaff S; Peberdy MA; Kontos MC; Fabiato A; Finucane S; Arena R
    J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev; 2011; 31(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 21427601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Defining Clinically Significant Improvement on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test at 1-Year Follow-up for Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.
    Bodendorfer BM; DeFroda SF; Clapp IM; Newhouse A; Nwachukwu BU; Nho SJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Jul; 49(9):2457-2465. PubMed ID: 34097552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do Patient Sociodemographic Factors Impact the PROMIS Scores Meeting the Patient-Acceptable Symptom State at the Initial Point of Care in Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Patients?
    Bernstein DN; Mayo K; Baumhauer JF; Dasilva C; Fear K; Houck JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Nov; 477(11):2555-2565. PubMed ID: 31261259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.