151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28577694)
1. Manual Compression versus Vascular Closing Device for Closing Access Puncture Site in Femoral Left-Heart Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Comparison of Costs and Effects in Inpatient Care.
Walter J; Vogl M; Holderried M; Becker C; Brandes A; Sinner MF; Rogowski W; Maschmann J
Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):769-776. PubMed ID: 28577694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Costs of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.
Amin AP; House JA; Safley DM; Chhatriwalla AK; Giersiefen H; Bremer A; Hamon M; Baklanov DV; Aluko A; Wohns D; Mathias DW; Applegate RA; Cohen DJ; Marso SP
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):827-34. PubMed ID: 23871512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial.
Schulz-Schüpke S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Ibrahim T; Linhardt M; Haas K; Hoppe K; Böttiger C; Groha P; Bradaric C; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Ott I; Goedel J; Byrne RA; Schneider S; Burgdorf C; Morath T; Kufner S; Joner M; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Hengstenberg C; Pache J; Fusaro M; Massberg S; Mehilli J; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
JAMA; 2014 Nov; 312(19):1981-7. PubMed ID: 25399273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Propensity score analysis of vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention 1998-2003.
Applegate RJ; Sacrinty MT; Kutcher MA; Baki TT; Gandhi SK; Santos RM; Little WC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Apr; 67(4):556-62. PubMed ID: 16532497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost effectiveness of radial access for diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention.
Applegate R; Sacrinty M; Schafer P; Smith J; Gandhi S; Kutcher M; Santos R; Cecile A; Little W
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E375-84. PubMed ID: 23074085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the FemoSeal Vascular Closure Device With Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture - Post-hoc Analysis of a Large-Scale, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Mankerious N; Mayer K; Gewalt SM; Helde SM; Ibrahim T; Bott-Flügel L; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Schüpke S;
J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):235-239. PubMed ID: 29760286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of contemporary vascular closure devices for the prevention of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions in an all-comers PCI population.
Kerré S; Kustermans L; Vandendriessche T; Bosmans J; Haine SE; Miljoen H; Vrints CJ; Beutels P; Wouters K; Claeys MJ
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24952056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and Subclinical Femoral Vascular Complications after Deployment of two Different Vascular Closure Devices or Manual Compression in the Setting of Coronary Intervention.
Yeni H; Axel M; Örnek A; Butz T; Maagh P; Plehn G
Int J Med Sci; 2016; 13(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 27076781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications with Angio-Seal™ vascular closure devices compared with manual compression after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Gregory D; Midodzi W; Pearce N
J Interv Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 26(6):630-8. PubMed ID: 24125119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison Between Radial Approach and Femoral Approach With Vascular Closure Devices on the Occurrence of Access-Site Complications and Periprocedural Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rigattieri S; Sciahbasi A; Ratib K; Alonzo A; Cox N; Chodór P; Berni A; Fedele S; Pugliese FR; Cooper CJ; Louvard Y; Nolan J; Rao SV
J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 28(12):473-479. PubMed ID: 27630147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the Duett sealing device on quality of life and hospitalization costs for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: Results from the Study of Economic and Quality of Life substudy of the SEAL trial.
Zhang Z; Mahoney EM; Gershony G; Ellis S; Saucedo JF; Talley JD; Feldman T; Weintraub WS
Am Heart J; 2001 Dec; 142(6):982-8. PubMed ID: 11717601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial).
Wong SC; Bachinsky W; Cambier P; Stoler R; Aji J; Rogers JH; Hermiller J; Nair R; Hutman H; Wang H;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug; 2(8):785-93. PubMed ID: 19695549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AbsorbaSeal™ Vascular Closure Device: A Novel Device for Hemostasis Following Interventional Peripheral Vascular Procedures.
Benham E; Deloose K; Callaert J; Bosiers M; Cox T; Lincourt A; Heniford BT
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Oct; 31():93-99. PubMed ID: 29020709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practices and complications of vascular closure devices and manual compression in patients undergoing elective transfemoral coronary procedures.
Smilowitz NR; Kirtane AJ; Guiry M; Gray WA; Dolcimascolo P; Querijero M; Echeverry C; Kalcheva N; Flores B; Singh VP; Rabbani L; Kodali S; Collins MB; Leon MB; Moses JW; Weisz G
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 110(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 22482861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The frequency of vascular complications associated with the use of vascular closure devices varies by indication for cardiac catheterization.
Stegemann E; Hoffmann R; Marso S; Stegemann B; Marx N; Lauer T
Clin Res Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 100(9):789-95. PubMed ID: 21479967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of costs between transradial and transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort analysis from the Premier research database.
Safley DM; Amin AP; House JA; Baklanov D; Mills R; Giersiefen H; Bremer A; Marso SP
Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):303-9.e2. PubMed ID: 23453097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the boomerang wire vascular access management system versus manual compression alone during percutaneous diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures: The boomerang™ wire vascular access management trial II.
Goswami NJ; Smalling RG; Sinha S; Gammon RS; Ramaiah VG
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jan; 87(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 25599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of pneumatic compression device and sand bag with respect to peripheral vascular complications in elective cardiac catheterization and percutaneous femoral artery interventions].
Beşli F; Alişir MF; Keçebaş M; Serdar OA; Güngören F
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2013 Sep; 41(6):478-85. PubMed ID: 24104971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
