130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28577698)
1. Eliciting Preferences for Clinical Follow-Up in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Using Best-Worst Scaling.
Meregaglia M; Cairns J; Alfieri S; Favales F; Mazzitelli D; Orlandi E; Licitra L; Bossi P
Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):799-808. PubMed ID: 28577698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Routine follow-up care after curative treatment of head and neck cancer: A survey of patients' needs and preferences for healthcare services.
Brennan KE; Hall SF; Yoo J; Rohland SL; Theurer J; Peng Y; Feldman-Stewart D
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Mar; 28(2):e12993. PubMed ID: 30656777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eliciting patient preferences, priorities and trade-offs for outcomes following kidney transplantation: a pilot best-worst scaling survey.
Howell M; Wong G; Rose J; Tong A; Craig JC; Howard K
BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e008163. PubMed ID: 26810994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data.
Potoglou D; Burge P; Flynn T; Netten A; Malley J; Forder J; Brazier JE
Soc Sci Med; 2011 May; 72(10):1717-27. PubMed ID: 21530040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients' preferences concerning follow-up after curative head and neck cancer treatment: A cross-sectional pilot study.
Mueller SA; Riggauer J; Elicin O; Blaser D; Trelle S; Giger R
Head Neck; 2019 Jul; 41(7):2174-2181. PubMed ID: 30723984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eliciting Preferences of Providers in Primary Care Settings for Post Hospital Discharge Patient Follow-Up.
Wang X; Song K; Chen L; Huang Y; Birch S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of life associated factors in head and neck cancer patients in a developing country using the FACT-H&N.
Bilal S; Doss JG; Cella D; Rogers SN
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 25555894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eliciting older people's preferences for exercise programs: a best-worst scaling choice experiment.
Franco MR; Howard K; Sherrington C; Ferreira PH; Rose J; Gomes JL; Ferreira ML
J Physiother; 2015 Jan; 61(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25499647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A turning point: Head and neck cancer patients' exercise preferences and barriers before and after participation in an exercise intervention.
Jackson C; Dowd AJ; Capozzi LC; Bridel W; Lau HY; Culos-Reed SN
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2018 Mar; 27(2):e12826. PubMed ID: 29377317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Head and neck cancer patients want us to support them psychologically in the posttreatment period: Survey results.
Henry M; Habib LA; Morrison M; Yang JW; Li XJ; Lin S; Zeitouni A; Payne R; MacDonald C; Mlynarek A; Kost K; Black M; Hier M
Palliat Support Care; 2014 Dec; 12(6):481-93. PubMed ID: 24153040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can (18)F-FDG PET/CT reliably assess response to primary treatment of head and neck cancer?
Ul-Hassan F; Simo R; Guerrero-Urbano T; Oakley R; Jeannon JP; Cook GJ
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Apr; 38(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 23429398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best-Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?
Ratcliffe J; Kaambwa B; Hutchinson C; Lancsar E
Patient; 2020 Jun; 13(3):307-315. PubMed ID: 31930462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Routine follow-up care for head and neck cancer after curative treatment: A 3-year experience of measuring patients' self-reported needs, preferences, quality of life and attitudes towards follow-up.
Brennan K; Hall S; Yoo J; Rohland S; Theurer J; Peng P
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2022 May; 31(3):e13581. PubMed ID: 35343002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome preferences of older people with multiple chronic conditions and hypertension: a cross-sectional survey using best-worst scaling.
Aschmann HE; Puhan MA; Robbins CW; Bayliss EA; Chan WV; Mularski RA; Wilson RF; Bennett WL; Sheehan OC; Yu T; Yebyo HG; Leff B; Tabano H; Armacost K; Glover C; Maslow K; Mintz S; Boyd CM
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Dec; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 31856842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-Utility of Stepped Care Targeting Psychological Distress in Patients With Head and Neck or Lung Cancer.
Jansen F; Krebber AM; Coupé VM; Cuijpers P; de Bree R; Becker-Commissaris A; Smit EF; van Straten A; Eeckhout GM; Beekman AT; Leemans CR; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM
J Clin Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(3):314-324. PubMed ID: 27918712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques.
Erdem S; Campbell D
Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 18(9):1107-1123. PubMed ID: 27942967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gynecological cancer patients' attitudes toward follow-up care after cancer treatment: Do preferences reflect patients' experience? A cross-sectional questionnaire study.
Fidjeland HL; Brekke M; Stokstad T; Vistad I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Nov; 97(11):1325-1331. PubMed ID: 29893058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm.
Ratcliffe J; Huynh E; Chen G; Stevens K; Swait J; Brazier J; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Flynn T
Soc Sci Med; 2016 May; 157():48-59. PubMed ID: 27060541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing internet and face-to-face surveys as methods for eliciting preferences for social care-related quality of life: evidence from England using the ASCOT service user measure.
Saloniki EC; Malley J; Burge P; Lu H; Batchelder L; Linnosmaa I; Trukeschitz B; Forder J
Qual Life Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2207-2220. PubMed ID: 30945131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient Preferences in the Treatment of Hemophilia A: A Best-Worst Scaling Case 3 Analysis.
Mühlbacher AC; Sadler A; Lamprecht B; Juhnke C
Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):862-869. PubMed ID: 32762987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]