BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28577698)

  • 1. Eliciting Preferences for Clinical Follow-Up in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Using Best-Worst Scaling.
    Meregaglia M; Cairns J; Alfieri S; Favales F; Mazzitelli D; Orlandi E; Licitra L; Bossi P
    Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):799-808. PubMed ID: 28577698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Routine follow-up care after curative treatment of head and neck cancer: A survey of patients' needs and preferences for healthcare services.
    Brennan KE; Hall SF; Yoo J; Rohland SL; Theurer J; Peng Y; Feldman-Stewart D
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Mar; 28(2):e12993. PubMed ID: 30656777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eliciting patient preferences, priorities and trade-offs for outcomes following kidney transplantation: a pilot best-worst scaling survey.
    Howell M; Wong G; Rose J; Tong A; Craig JC; Howard K
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e008163. PubMed ID: 26810994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data.
    Potoglou D; Burge P; Flynn T; Netten A; Malley J; Forder J; Brazier JE
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 May; 72(10):1717-27. PubMed ID: 21530040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patients' preferences concerning follow-up after curative head and neck cancer treatment: A cross-sectional pilot study.
    Mueller SA; Riggauer J; Elicin O; Blaser D; Trelle S; Giger R
    Head Neck; 2019 Jul; 41(7):2174-2181. PubMed ID: 30723984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eliciting Preferences of Providers in Primary Care Settings for Post Hospital Discharge Patient Follow-Up.
    Wang X; Song K; Chen L; Huang Y; Birch S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of life associated factors in head and neck cancer patients in a developing country using the FACT-H&N.
    Bilal S; Doss JG; Cella D; Rogers SN
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 25555894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eliciting older people's preferences for exercise programs: a best-worst scaling choice experiment.
    Franco MR; Howard K; Sherrington C; Ferreira PH; Rose J; Gomes JL; Ferreira ML
    J Physiother; 2015 Jan; 61(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25499647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A turning point: Head and neck cancer patients' exercise preferences and barriers before and after participation in an exercise intervention.
    Jackson C; Dowd AJ; Capozzi LC; Bridel W; Lau HY; Culos-Reed SN
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2018 Mar; 27(2):e12826. PubMed ID: 29377317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Head and neck cancer patients want us to support them psychologically in the posttreatment period: Survey results.
    Henry M; Habib LA; Morrison M; Yang JW; Li XJ; Lin S; Zeitouni A; Payne R; MacDonald C; Mlynarek A; Kost K; Black M; Hier M
    Palliat Support Care; 2014 Dec; 12(6):481-93. PubMed ID: 24153040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can (18)F-FDG PET/CT reliably assess response to primary treatment of head and neck cancer?
    Ul-Hassan F; Simo R; Guerrero-Urbano T; Oakley R; Jeannon JP; Cook GJ
    Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Apr; 38(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 23429398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best-Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?
    Ratcliffe J; Kaambwa B; Hutchinson C; Lancsar E
    Patient; 2020 Jun; 13(3):307-315. PubMed ID: 31930462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Routine follow-up care for head and neck cancer after curative treatment: A 3-year experience of measuring patients' self-reported needs, preferences, quality of life and attitudes towards follow-up.
    Brennan K; Hall S; Yoo J; Rohland S; Theurer J; Peng P
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2022 May; 31(3):e13581. PubMed ID: 35343002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome preferences of older people with multiple chronic conditions and hypertension: a cross-sectional survey using best-worst scaling.
    Aschmann HE; Puhan MA; Robbins CW; Bayliss EA; Chan WV; Mularski RA; Wilson RF; Bennett WL; Sheehan OC; Yu T; Yebyo HG; Leff B; Tabano H; Armacost K; Glover C; Maslow K; Mintz S; Boyd CM
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Dec; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 31856842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-Utility of Stepped Care Targeting Psychological Distress in Patients With Head and Neck or Lung Cancer.
    Jansen F; Krebber AM; Coupé VM; Cuijpers P; de Bree R; Becker-Commissaris A; Smit EF; van Straten A; Eeckhout GM; Beekman AT; Leemans CR; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM
    J Clin Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(3):314-324. PubMed ID: 27918712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferences for public involvement in health service decisions: a comparison between best-worst scaling and trio-wise stated preference elicitation techniques.
    Erdem S; Campbell D
    Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 18(9):1107-1123. PubMed ID: 27942967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gynecological cancer patients' attitudes toward follow-up care after cancer treatment: Do preferences reflect patients' experience? A cross-sectional questionnaire study.
    Fidjeland HL; Brekke M; Stokstad T; Vistad I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Nov; 97(11):1325-1331. PubMed ID: 29893058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Valuing the Child Health Utility 9D: Using profile case best worst scaling methods to develop a new adolescent specific scoring algorithm.
    Ratcliffe J; Huynh E; Chen G; Stevens K; Swait J; Brazier J; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Flynn T
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 May; 157():48-59. PubMed ID: 27060541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing internet and face-to-face surveys as methods for eliciting preferences for social care-related quality of life: evidence from England using the ASCOT service user measure.
    Saloniki EC; Malley J; Burge P; Lu H; Batchelder L; Linnosmaa I; Trukeschitz B; Forder J
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2207-2220. PubMed ID: 30945131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient Preferences in the Treatment of Hemophilia A: A Best-Worst Scaling Case 3 Analysis.
    Mühlbacher AC; Sadler A; Lamprecht B; Juhnke C
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):862-869. PubMed ID: 32762987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.