These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2857821)

  • 1. Research on embryos.
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8426):451-2. PubMed ID: 2857821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Embryo research.
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8423):255-6. PubMed ID: 2857322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Built-in obsolescence: women, embryo production, and genetic engineering.
    Bartels D
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 11650374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. British government hedges bets on embryo research.
    Hadlington S
    Nature; 1987 Dec 3-9; 330(6147):409. PubMed ID: 3683559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Council agrees response to Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Report of inquiry into human fertilisation and embryology: Medical Research Council's response.
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8423):270. PubMed ID: 2857331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Embryo research: UK legislation further delayed.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 1986 Dec 18-31; 324(6098):604. PubMed ID: 3796722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
    Priest JA
    Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-tube embryology in the dock.
    Dickson D
    Science; 1984 Aug; 225(4662):606. PubMed ID: 6740327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A bill that should be stopped.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Feb; 290(6468):586. PubMed ID: 3918682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why experiment on human embryos?
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1989 Nov; 124(1689):48-50. PubMed ID: 11659163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time to break down taboos about infertility.
    Templeton AA
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):39. PubMed ID: 11658552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supplementary annual report of Council, 1982-1983. Appendix VI: Interim report on human in vitro fertilisation and embryo replacement and transfer.
    British Medical Association
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 May; 286(6377):1594-5. PubMed ID: 11652399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commons debates Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Dec; 289(6458):1639. PubMed ID: 11652438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Government seeks views on 'test-tube' babies.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1986 Dec; 112(1539):3. PubMed ID: 11658779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why study early human development?
    McLaren A
    New Sci; 1986 Apr; 109(1505):49-52. PubMed ID: 11658803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report.
    Gillon R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medicine and the Law. In-vitro fertilisation and related research. Why Parliament must legislate.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1983 Sep; 2(8352):726-9. PubMed ID: 6136851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test-tube baby pioneer quits.
    Ford J
    New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):5. PubMed ID: 11655609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.