These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28578222)

  • 1. Using prosody to infer discourse prominence in cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Huang YT; Newman RS; Catalano A; Goupell MJ
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():184-200. PubMed ID: 28578222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-Analysis on the Identification of Linguistic and Emotional Prosody in Cochlear Implant Users and Vocoder Simulations.
    Everhardt MK; Sarampalis A; Coler M; Başkent D; Lowie W
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1092-1102. PubMed ID: 32251011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Waiting for lexical access: Cochlear implants or severely degraded input lead listeners to process speech less incrementally.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Rigler H
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():147-164. PubMed ID: 28917133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.
    Peng SC; Chatterjee M; Lu N
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 22790392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition of Accented Speech by Cochlear-Implant Listeners: Benefit of Audiovisual Cues.
    Waddington E; Jaekel BN; Tinnemore AR; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1236-1250. PubMed ID: 32069269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.
    Richter ME; Chatterjee M
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1727-1740. PubMed ID: 34294630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Residual Acoustic Hearing and Adaptation to Uncertainty on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.
    McMurray B; Farris-Trimble A; Seedorff M; Rigler H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e37-51. PubMed ID: 26317298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More Than Words: the Relative Roles of Prosody and Semantics in the Perception of Emotions in Spoken Language by Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Icht M; Ben-David BM
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1378-1389. PubMed ID: 35030551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners.
    Peng SC; Lu N; Chatterjee M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):327-37. PubMed ID: 19372651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of lexical stress cued by low-frequency pitch and insights into speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users and normal hearing adults.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Mancini P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 276(10):2673-2680. PubMed ID: 31177325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.
    Morris D; Magnusson L; Faulkner A; Jönsson R; Juul H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):879-90. PubMed ID: 24224994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech intonation and melodic contour recognition in children with cochlear implants and with normal hearing.
    See RL; Driscoll VD; Gfeller K; Kliethermes S; Oleson J
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):490-8. PubMed ID: 23442568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Xin Luo ; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Dec; 11(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 18003871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential stream segregation in normally-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Tejani VD; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):50. PubMed ID: 28147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():113-23. PubMed ID: 24368138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contribution of bimodal hearing to lexical tone normalization in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Chang YP; Lin CY; Chang RY
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():1-8. PubMed ID: 24576834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and cue use in word segmentation for cochlear-implant listeners and normal-hearing listeners presented vocoded speech.
    Heffner CC; Jaekel BN; Newman RS; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2936. PubMed ID: 34717484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.