These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28578876)

  • 1. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
    Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low- and high-frequency cortical brain oscillations reflect dissociable mechanisms of concurrent speech segregation in noise.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2018 Apr; 361():92-102. PubMed ID: 29398142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in the auditory cortex is limited to favorable signal-to-noise ratios.
    Suresh CH; Krishnan A; Gandour JT
    Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 355():42-53. PubMed ID: 28927640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of competing noise on cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds in 7- to 25-year-old listeners.
    Gustafson SJ; Billings CJ; Hornsby BWY; Key AP
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():103-112. PubMed ID: 30660965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential stream segregation of voiced and unvoiced speech sounds based on fundamental frequency.
    David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():235-243. PubMed ID: 27923739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Li X; Jeng FC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):EL21-6. PubMed ID: 21302977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
    Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence of a speech evoked electrophysiological release from masking in noise.
    Faucette SP; Stuart A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL218. PubMed ID: 28863590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss.
    Mackersie CL; Dewey J; Guthrie LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):1006-19. PubMed ID: 21877813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of confusion patterns to evaluate the neural basis for concurrent vowel identification.
    Chintanpalli A; Heinz MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 24116434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural Representation of Concurrent Vowels in Macaque Primary Auditory Cortex.
    Fishman YI; Micheyl C; Steinschneider M
    eNeuro; 2016; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 27294198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of age and hearing loss on auditory stream segregation of speech sounds.
    David M; Tausend AN; Strelcyk O; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():118-128. PubMed ID: 29602593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brainstem-cortical functional connectivity for speech is differentially challenged by noise and reverberation.
    Bidelman GM; Davis MK; Pridgen MH
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():149-160. PubMed ID: 29871826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contribution of low-frequency harmonics to Mandarin Chinese tone identification in quiet and six-talker babble background.
    Liu C; Azimi B; Bhandary M; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):428-38. PubMed ID: 24437783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitch strength of noise-vocoded harmonic tone complexes in normal-hearing listeners.
    Shofner WP; Campbell J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL398-404. PubMed ID: 23145701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.