BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28578921)

  • 1. Impaired social cognition in schizophrenia during the Ultimatum Game: An EEG study.
    Horat SK; Favre G; Prévot A; Ventura J; Herrmann FR; Gothuey I; Merlo MCG; Missonnier P
    Schizophr Res; 2018 Feb; 192():308-316. PubMed ID: 28578921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in Social Decision-Making between Proposers and Responders during the Ultimatum Game: An EEG Study.
    Horat SK; Prévot A; Richiardi J; Herrmann FR; Favre G; Merlo MCG; Missonnier P
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2017; 11():13. PubMed ID: 28744204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taking it easy when playing ultimatum game with a Down syndrome proposer: Effects on behavior and medial frontal negativity.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; do Egito JHT; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 12(5):530-540. PubMed ID: 27237685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
    Ma Q; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are patients with schizophrenia rational maximizers? Evidence from an ultimatum game study.
    Csukly G; Polgár P; Tombor L; Réthelyi J; Kéri S
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 May; 187(1-2):11-7. PubMed ID: 21035194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examination of social decision making in patients with schizophrenia using ultimatum game.
    Patil VA; Jacob AA; Chacko DM; Chakrabarti D; Devi P; Thonse U; Kumar V; Varambally S; Venkatasubramanian G; Rao NP
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2020 Apr; 50():101937. PubMed ID: 32109802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultimatum bargaining behavior of people affected by schizophrenia.
    Agay N; Kron S; Carmel Z; Mendlovic S; Levkovitz Y
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Jan; 157(1-3):39-46. PubMed ID: 17916386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adult-like neuroelectrical response to inequity in children: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Rêgo GG; Campanhã C; Kassab AP; Romero RL; Minati L; Boggio PS
    Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 26079157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theory of mind deficits partly mediate impaired social decision-making in schizophrenia.
    Yang L; Li P; Mao H; Wang H; Shu C; Bliksted V; Zhou Y
    BMC Psychiatry; 2017 May; 17(1):168. PubMed ID: 28476141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural responses to social decision-making in suicide attempters with mental disorders.
    Liu S; Duan M; Sun Y; Wang L; An L; Ming D
    BMC Psychiatry; 2023 Jan; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 36624426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related changes in social decision-making: An electrophysiological analysis of unfairness evaluation in the Ultimatum Game.
    Fernandes C; Gonçalves AR; Pasion R; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Martins IP; Marques-Teixeira J
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jan; 692():122-126. PubMed ID: 30391319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity to fairness and intentions of others in the ultimatum game in patients with ventromedial prefontal lesions.
    Shamay-Tsoory SG; Suleiman R; Aharon-Peretz J; Gohary R; Hirschberger G
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2012 Nov; 18(6):952-61. PubMed ID: 23158227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social value orientation modulates context-based social comparison preference in the outcome evaluation: An ERP study.
    Qi Y; Wu H; Raiha S; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():135-144. PubMed ID: 29501790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An ERP study.
    Wang G; Li J; Li Z; Wei M; Li S
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():38-46. PubMed ID: 26930614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. You did not mean it: Perceived good intentions alleviate sense of unfairness.
    Ma Q; Meng L; Zhang Z; Xu Q; Wang Y; Shen Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 25863263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Moral transgression modulates fairness considerations in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERP and EEG data.
    Chen T; Tang R; Yang X; Peng M; Cai M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Jun; 188():1-11. PubMed ID: 36889599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The neural correlate of mid-value offers in ultimatum game.
    Zhong X; Wang R; Huang S; Chen J; Chen H; Qu C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220622. PubMed ID: 31430295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the Ultimatum Game.
    Koenigs M; Tranel D
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(4):951-6. PubMed ID: 17251437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    Sanfey AG; Rilling JK; Aronson JA; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1755-8. PubMed ID: 12805551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proposer's moral identity modulates fairness processing in the ultimatum game: Evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Fan C; Wang H; Liu D; Sun J; Han F; He W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2024 Jul; 201():112360. PubMed ID: 38735630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.