These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28578921)

  • 21. Influences of State and Trait Affect on Behavior, Feedback-Related Negativity, and P3b in the Ultimatum Game.
    Riepl K; Mussel P; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146358. PubMed ID: 26742103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Behavioral and neuronal determinants of negative reciprocity in the ultimatum game.
    Kaltwasser L; Hildebrandt A; Wilhelm O; Sommer W
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1608-17. PubMed ID: 27261490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationship between platelet serotonin content and rejections of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Emanuele E; Brondino N; Bertona M; Re S; Geroldi D
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 437(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 18448251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness.
    Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.
    Nowak MA; Page KM; Sigmund K
    Science; 2000 Sep; 289(5485):1773-5. PubMed ID: 10976075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceived relative social status and cognitive load influence acceptance of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game.
    Harris A; Young A; Hughson L; Green D; Doan SN; Hughson E; Reed CL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227717. PubMed ID: 31917806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Responding to unfair offers made by a friend: neuroelectrical activity changes in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex.
    Campanhã C; Minati L; Fregni F; Boggio PS
    J Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 31(43):15569-74. PubMed ID: 22031902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Developmental changes of neuronal networks associated with strategic social decision-making.
    Steinmann E; Schmalor A; Prehn-Kristensen A; Wolff S; Galka A; Möhring J; Gerber WD; Petermann F; Stephani U; Siniatchkin M
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():37-46. PubMed ID: 24412687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intention affects fairness processing: Evidence from behavior and representational similarity analysis of event-related potential signals.
    Xu Q; Hu J; Qin Y; Li G; Zhang X; Li P
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Apr; 44(6):2451-2464. PubMed ID: 36749642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders.
    Mayer SV; Rauss K; Pourtois G; Jusyte A; Schönenberg M
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 269(6):731-740. PubMed ID: 29397410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selective anterior cingulate cortex deficit during conflict solution in schizophrenia: an event-related potential study.
    Neuhaus AH; Koehler S; Opgen-Rhein C; Urbanek C; Hahn E; Dettling M
    J Psychiatr Res; 2007 Oct; 41(8):635-44. PubMed ID: 16908030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of facial attractiveness and alleged personality traits on fairness decisions in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERPs.
    Li T; Liang Z; Yuan Y; Sommer W; Li W
    Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108809. PubMed ID: 38718883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rational maximizing by humans (Homo sapiens) in an ultimatum game.
    Smith P; Silberberg A
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Jul; 13(4):671-7. PubMed ID: 20130945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Social value orientation modulates the FRN and P300 in the chicken game.
    Wang Y; Kuhlman DM; Roberts K; Yuan B; Zhang Z; Zhang W; Simons RF
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jul; 127():89-98. PubMed ID: 28465046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigating the impact of offer frame manipulations on responders playing the ultimatum game.
    Fabre EF; Rumiati R; Causse M; Mailliez M; Cacciari C; Lotto L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Dec; 182():129-141. PubMed ID: 36265755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Brain substrates of social decision-making in dual diagnosis: cocaine dependence and personality disorders.
    Verdejo-Garcia A; Verdejo-Román J; Albein-Urios N; Martínez-González JM; Soriano-Mas C
    Addict Biol; 2017 Mar; 22(2):457-467. PubMed ID: 26442666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Smiling faces, sometimes they don't tell the truth: facial expression in the ultimatum game impacts decision making and event-related potentials.
    Mussel P; Hewig J; Allen JJ; Coles MG; Miltner W
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Apr; 51(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 24611909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The temporal course of the influence of anxiety on fairness considerations.
    Luo Y; Wu T; Broster LS; Feng C; Zhang D; Gu R; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Sep; 51(9):834-842. PubMed ID: 24840323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.