739 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28579018)
21. Higher offset cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners: is wear a significant clinical concern?
Chapman RM; Van Citters DW; Chapman D; Dalury DF
Hip Int; 2019 Nov; 29(6):652-659. PubMed ID: 30522361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High Variability of Acetabular Offset in Primary Hip Osteoarthritis Influences Acetabular Reaming-A Computed Tomography-Based Anatomic Study.
Merle C; Innmann MM; Waldstein W; Pegg EC; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW; Grammatopoulos G
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1808-1814. PubMed ID: 31122846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement].
Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cementless cups do not increase osteolysis risk in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Apropos of 106 cases.
Beldame J; Carreras F; Oger P; Beaufils P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Nov; 95(7):478-90. PubMed ID: 19801209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Utilization of Metal Augments Allows Better Biomechanical Reconstruction of the Hip in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Severe Acetabular Defects: A Comparative Study.
Zhou B; Zhou Y; Yang D; Tang H; Shao H; Huang Y
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3724-3733. PubMed ID: 30243881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reconstruction of femoro-acetabular offsets using a short-stem.
Kutzner KP; Kovacevic MP; Roeder C; Rehbein P; Pfeil J
Int Orthop; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1269-75. PubMed ID: 25522801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Outcome of a hemispherical porous-coated acetabular component with a proximally hydroxyapatite-coated anatomical femoral component: an update at 23 to 26 years’ follow-up.
García-Rey E; Carbonell-Escobar R; Cordero-Ampuero J; García-Cimbrelo E
Bone Joint J; 2019 Apr; 101-B(4):378-385. PubMed ID: 30929484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Retention of all-polyethylene acetabular components after femoral revision of a cemented total hip replacement.
Hamlin BR; Rowland C; Morrey BF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1700-5. PubMed ID: 11701794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Should the acetabular cup be medialised in total hip arthroplasty.
Bonnin MP; Archbold PH; Basiglini L; Selmi TA; Beverland DE
Hip Int; 2011; 21(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 21818743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Do screws and screw holes affect osteolysis in cementless cups using highly crosslinked polyethylene? A 7 to 10-year follow-up case-control study.
Taniguchi N; Jinno T; Takada R; Koga D; Ando T; Okawa A; Haro H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):307-315. PubMed ID: 29355741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty.
Sakalkale DP; Sharkey PF; Eng K; Hozack WJ; Rothman RH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Jul; (388):125-34. PubMed ID: 11451111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Total hip replacement in osteoarthritis with acetabular protrusion].
Rozkydal Z; Kunovský R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(5):296-302. PubMed ID: 14669592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Correlations between polyethylene wear direction and other influencing factors in total hip arthroplasty].
Lan T; Xiao J; Shi Z
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 94(43):3416-20. PubMed ID: 25622673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Results of total hip arthroplasty for Crowe Type III developmental hip dysplasia.
Stans AA; Pagnano MW; Shaughnessy WJ; Hanssen AD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):149-57. PubMed ID: 9553547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [APPLICATION AND EFFECTIVENESS OF BIOLOGICAL TYPE ACETABULAR CUP IN ADULT Crowe TYPE IV DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA OF THE HIP].
Xu N; Sun J; Zhao X; Wang T
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jan; 30(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 27062843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hip resurfacing and conventional THA: comparison of acetabular bone stock removal, leg length, and offset.
Brown NM; Foran JR; Della Valle CJ
Orthopedics; 2013 May; 36(5):e637-41. PubMed ID: 23672918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Higher UHMWPE wear-rate in cementless compared with cemented cups with the Saturne® Dual-Mobility acetabular system.
Tabori-Jensen S; Frølich C; Hansen TB; Bøvling S; Homilius M; Stilling M
Hip Int; 2018 Mar; 28(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29890909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
