These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28580331)

  • 1. Beam Collimation during Lumbar Spine Radiography: A Retrospective Study.
    Karami V; Zabihzadeh M
    J Biomed Phys Eng; 2017 Jun; 7(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 28580331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lumbar spine radiography--poor collimation practices after implementation of digital technology.
    Zetterberg LG; Espeland A
    Br J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 84(1002):566-9. PubMed ID: 21606070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. OPTIMAL COLLIMATION SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVES LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHY.
    Pazanin A; Skrk D; O'Driscoll JC; McEntee MF; Mekis N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(4):420-427. PubMed ID: 32363403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do radiographers collimate? A retrospective analysis of radiographic collimation of common musculoskeletal examinations at an adult trauma centre.
    Ball S; McKerrow M; Murphy A
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 70(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36319191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the use of higher kVp and copper filtration as a dose optimisation tool in digital planar radiography.
    Mifsud K; Portelli JL; Zarb F; Couto JG
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 35504239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collimation and Exposure Parameter Influence Image Quality and Potential Radiation Dose to the Eye Lens of Personnel in Computed Radiography of the Canine Pelvis.
    Bisgaard M; McEvoy FJ; Nielsen DH; Allberg C; Müller AV; Timm S; Meyer SN; Johansen LM; Pedersen S; Precht H
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():684064. PubMed ID: 34970612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does collimation affect patient dose in antero-posterior thoraco-lumbar spine?
    Robinson JB; Ali RM; Tootell AK; Hogg P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):211-215. PubMed ID: 28687288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective dose reduction using collimation function in digital panoramic radiography and possible clinical implications in dentistry.
    Benchimol D; Koivisto J; Kadesjö N; Shi XQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Oct; 47(7):20180007. PubMed ID: 29722543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of effective dose and risk for different collimation options used in AP shoulder radiography.
    Singh T; Muscroft N; Collier N; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):394-399. PubMed ID: 34887196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling skin collimation using the electron pencil beam redefinition algorithm.
    Chi PC; Hogstrom KR; Starkschall G; Antolak JA; Boyd RA
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3409-18. PubMed ID: 16370427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
    Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.
    Peacock NE; Steward AL; Riley PJ
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 32495517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Light beam diaphragm collimation errors and their effects on radiation dose for pelvic radiography.
    Brookfield H; Manning-Stanley A; England A
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 25835404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating cone cut in rectangular collimation in intraoral radiography: application of ALADA and radiation stewardship.
    Clark-Perry D; Berkhout WER; Sanderink GC; Slot DE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):5391-5402. PubMed ID: 37537518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lumbar spine radiographs - is it time for widespread adoption of posteroanterior projection?
    Green C; Karnati G; Thomson K; Subramanian A
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190386. PubMed ID: 31356113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IMPACT OF RADIATION FIELD SIZE ON ABSORBED ORGAN DOSES IN NEONATES UNDERGOING CHEST RADIOGRAPHY IN AN ANTERIOR-POSTERIOR PROJECTION: A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION STUDY.
    Elshami W; Tekin HO; Abuzaid MM; Issa B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2022 Feb; 198(1-2):44-52. PubMed ID: 35039861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gridless adult cervical spine radiography and its' effect on image quality and radiation dose: A phantom study.
    Mekis N; Bianchi T; Doyle C; Gauchat M; Geerling I; Linneman J; Staats S; Campeanu C
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):359-366. PubMed ID: 38141429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Focus Film Distance (FFD) variation on entrance testicular dose in lumbar-pelvic radiography.
    Dilger R; Egan I; Hayek R
    Australas Chiropr Osteopathy; 1997 Mar; 6(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 17987147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical utility of postprocessed low-dose radiographs in skeletal imaging.
    Kolck J; Ziegeler K; Walter-Rittel T; Hermann KGA; Hamm B; Beck A
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20210881. PubMed ID: 34919419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How does a non-optimal tube potential influence radiation dose to the patient in lumbar spine radiography?
    Alukic E; Mekis N
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Nov; 27(4):1105-1109. PubMed ID: 34011453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.