These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

45 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 285805)

  • 1. [The necessity of bite wing registration for the diagnosis of caries].
    Bier-Katz G
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 Mar; 34(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 285805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in-vitro comparison of visual inspection, bite-wing radiography, and laser fluorescence methods for the diagnosis of occlusal caries.
    Pourhashemi SJ; Jafari A; Motahhari P; Panjnoosh M; Kharrazi Fard MJ; Sanati I; Sahadfar M; Pariab M
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 19736501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Variations among dentists in the diagnosis of caries and assessment of dental restorations].
    Poorterman JH; Verheij JG; Kieft JA; Eijkman MA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Jun; 104(6):214-8. PubMed ID: 11923916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Bitewing radiographs in dentistry: how frequently are they indicated?].
    Verdonschot EH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Dec; 102(12):488-91. PubMed ID: 11836819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The diagnosis of approximal caries--a comparison of clinical, fiber optic and x-ray diagnostic procedures (the diagnosis of approximal caries)].
    Heinrich R; Künzel W; Tawfiq H
    Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1991; 79(7):535-42. PubMed ID: 1756216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Caries diagnosis: the lesions are central].
    Huysmans MC; Verdonschot EH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2003 Dec; 110(12):476-81. PubMed ID: 14710615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Study of caries using axial-mesial-distal sections and interproximal and periapical radiographs with paralleling and bisecting technics].
    Ferreira ET; Matson E; de Oliveira JX; de Freitas A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 2135428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient's age at the initial detection of interproximal caries.
    Kronmiller JE; Nirschl RF; Zullo TG
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 3162470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Routine dental examination as evaluation tool in clinical cariology].
    Mettes TG; van der Sanden WJ; Mikx FH; Verdonschot EH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2003 Dec; 110(12):488-92. PubMed ID: 14710617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography.
    Virajsilp V; Thearmontree A; Aryatawong S; Paiboonwarachat D
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 16532891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Bite-wing and early diagnosis of interproximal caries].
    Prando G; Oddera M; Teppati A
    Riv Odontoiatr Amici Brugg; 1990; 9(4):79-87. PubMed ID: 2095464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Decision making analysis and the diagnosis of approximal caries].
    Mileman PA; Vissers T; Purdell-Lewis DJ; van de Poel AC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1989 Feb; 96(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 2695848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of extraoral bite-wing radiography in detecting proximal caries and crestal bone loss.
    Chan M; Dadul T; Langlais R; Russell D; Ahmad M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2018 Jan; 149(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 29096875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A comparison between two and four bite-wing radiograph series in relation to caries diagnosis (author's transl)].
    Dutra HH; Moraes N
    Estomatol Cult; 1975; 9(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 801875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The bisector projection or bite-wing technique in the radiologic diagnosis of proximal primary caries. A comparison between methods and a study of discrepancies between observers.
    Lundberg M
    Odontol Tidskr; 1965 Dec; 73(6):567-78. PubMed ID: 5217196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Changes in the technics of obtaining bite wing radiographs for the study of interproximal caries in children].
    Leache EB
    Bol Inf Dent (Madr); 1983 Apr; 43(327):53-8. PubMed ID: 6590070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation between film position, bite-wing shadows, clinical pitfalls, and the histologic size of approximal lesions.
    Benn DK; Watson TF
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Feb; 20(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 2762503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Use of filmholders to obtain reproducible bite-wing films for the diagnosis of caries].
    Kirkegaard E; Sewerin I
    Tandlaegebladet; 1982 May; 86(9):297-302. PubMed ID: 6960536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Detection of interproximal caries by transillumination].
    Duquette P; Lemay H; Boudrias P
    J Dent Que; 1980; 17():59-61. PubMed ID: 6938560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extraoral bite-wing radiographs: A universally accepted paradox.
    Johnson KB; Mol A; Tyndall DA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 Jun; 152(6):444-447. PubMed ID: 34044975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.