105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28580578)
1. Cervical cancer in women under 25 years of age in Queensland, Australia: To what extent is the diagnosis made by screening cytology?
Morgan EL; Sanday K; Budd A; Hammond IG; Nicklin J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Aug; 57(4):469-472. PubMed ID: 28580578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using probabilistic record linkage methods to identify Australian Indigenous women on the Queensland Pap Smear Register: the National Indigenous Cervical Screening Project.
Whop LJ; Diaz A; Baade P; Garvey G; Cunningham J; Brotherton JM; Canfell K; Valery PC; O'Connell DL; Taylor C; Moore SP; Condon JR
BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e009540. PubMed ID: 26873047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden.
Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ploner A; Ström P; Elfström KM; Dillner J; Sparén P
PLoS Med; 2017 Oct; 14(10):e1002414. PubMed ID: 29065127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of the National Cervical Screening Programme on the presentation of cancer of the cervix in Canterbury.
Simcock B; Sykes P; Laney M
N Z Med J; 2001 Aug; 114(1138):378-80. PubMed ID: 11589435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why Do Women Get Cervical Cancer in an Organized Screening Program in Canada?
Jackson R; Wang L; Jembere N; Murphy J; Kupets R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 30489433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening history in women with cervical cancer in a Danish population-based screening program.
Kirschner B; Poll S; Rygaard C; Wåhlin A; Junge J
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jan; 120(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 21035171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pap smear screening history of women with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Pak SC; Martens M; Bekkers R; Crandon AJ; Land R; Nicklin JL; Perrin LC; Obermair A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Dec; 47(6):504-7. PubMed ID: 17991118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening frequency and histologic type influence the efficacy of cervical cancer screening: A nationwide cohort study.
Chiang YC; Chen YY; Hsieh SF; Chiang CJ; You SL; Cheng WF; Lai MS; Chen CA;
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 56(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 28805598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cervical cancer in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania. Tumor stage, histological tumor type, age and screening participation of 985 patients].
Marquardt K; Stubbe M; Broschewitz U
Pathologe; 2016 Feb; 37(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26660458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer in the Netherlands 1989-1998: Decrease of squamous cell carcinoma in older women, increase of adenocarcinoma in younger women.
Bulk S; Visser O; Rozendaal L; Verheijen RH; Meijer CJ
Int J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 113(6):1005-9. PubMed ID: 15515017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study.
Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ström P; Ploner A; Elfström KM; Arnheim-Dahlström L; Dillner J; Sparén P
BMJ; 2016 Feb; 352():i276. PubMed ID: 26869597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnosis and treatment of invasive cervical cancer in Cambodia (apropos of 35 cases)].
Monchy D; Lieng CR; Kruy LS; Kahler K; Eav S
Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2005 Sep; 98(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 16267957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The first comprehensive report on Indigenous Australian women's inequalities in cervical screening: A retrospective registry cohort study in Queensland, Australia (2000-2011).
Whop LJ; Garvey G; Baade P; Cunningham J; Lokuge K; Brotherton JM; Valery PC; O'Connell DL; Canfell K; Diaz A; Roder D; Gertig D; Moore SP; Condon JR
Cancer; 2016 May; 122(10):1560-9. PubMed ID: 27149550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time to clinical investigation for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Queensland women after a high grade abnormal Pap smear, 2000-2009.
Whop LJ; Baade PD; Brotherton JM; Canfell K; Cunningham J; Gertig D; Lokuge K; Garvey G; Moore SP; Diaz A; O'Connell DL; Valery P; Roder DM; Condon JR
Med J Aust; 2017 Feb; 206(2):73-77. PubMed ID: 28152354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening test results associated with cancer diagnoses in 287 women with cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Li Z; Austin RM; Guo M; Zhao C
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Dec; 136(12):1533-40. PubMed ID: 22900617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
