296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28580702)
1. Evidence for an attentional component of inhibition of return in visual search.
Pierce AM; Crouse MD; Green JJ
Psychophysiology; 2017 Nov; 54(11):1676-1685. PubMed ID: 28580702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrophysiological evidence of an attentional bias in crossmodal inhibition of return.
Pierce AM; McDonald JJ; Green JJ
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jun; 114():11-18. PubMed ID: 29630915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From alternation to repetition: Spatial attention biases contribute to sequential effects in a choice reaction-time task.
Green JJ; Spalek TM; McDonald JJ
Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 11(1-2):24-36. PubMed ID: 31512985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inhibition of return in the covert deployment of attention: evidence from human electrophysiology.
McDonald JJ; Hickey C; Green JJ; Whitman JC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):725-33. PubMed ID: 18564041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential consequences of orienting attention in parallel and serial search: an ERP study.
Tian Y; Chica AB; Xu P; Yao D
Brain Res; 2011 May; 1391():81-92. PubMed ID: 21458425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of ignored versus foveated cues upon inhibition of return: an event-related potential study.
Satel J; Hilchey MD; Wang Z; Story R; Klein RM
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 23077028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Spread of inhibition of return in visual search].
Takeda Y; Endo N
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2003 Dec; 74(5):437-43. PubMed ID: 15029760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. There's little return for attentional momentum.
Snyder JJ; Schmidt WC; Kingstone A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1726-37. PubMed ID: 19968431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiological revelations of trial history effects in a color oddball search task.
Shin E; Chong SC
Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1878-1888. PubMed ID: 27699796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When experience with scenes foils attentional orienting: ERP evidence against flexible target-context mapping in visual search.
Zinchenko A; Geyer T; Zang X; Shi Z; Müller HJ; Conci M
Cortex; 2024 Jun; 175():41-53. PubMed ID: 38703715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of different directions of attentional shift on inhibition of return in three-dimensional space.
Wang A; Liu X; Chen Q; Zhang M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 26758976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inhibition of return: a "depth-blind" mechanism?
Casagrande M; Barbato M; Mereu S; Martella D; Marotta A; Theeuwes J; Collinson SL
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 22465912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems.
Welsh TN; Elliott D; Anson JG; Dhillon V; Weeks DJ; Lyons JL; Chua R
Neurosci Lett; 2005 Sep; 385(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 15927370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cuing study of the N2pc component: an index of attentional deployment to objects rather than spatial locations.
Woodman GF; Arita JT; Luck SJ
Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1297():101-11. PubMed ID: 19682440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Speed of Serial Attention Shifts in Visual Search: Evidence from the N2pc Component.
Grubert A; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 28(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 26488588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertical asymmetries and inhibition of return: effects of spatial and non-spatial cueing on behavior and visual ERPs.
Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Pazo-Álvarez P; Doallo S; Fuentes LJ; Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 24342058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feature-guided attentional capture cannot be prevented by spatial filtering.
Berggren N; Eimer M
Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():1-8. PubMed ID: 29458180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
