39 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28580791)
1. The use of accelerometer bracelets to evaluate arm motor function over a stroke rehabilitation period - an explorative observational study.
Lyckegård Finn E; Carlsson H; Ericson P; Åström K; Brogårdh C; Wasselius J
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2024 May; 21(1):82. PubMed ID: 38769565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke.
Stewart JC; Cramer SC
Stroke; 2013 Apr; 44(4):1111-6. PubMed ID: 23422082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responsiveness and construct validity of two outcome measures of bilateral upper limb function in patients with chronic stroke.
Tsai HT; Lau HY; Lin KC; Li YC; Lin CJ; Yao G; Lee YY; Chen WS; Chen CL; Chang YJ; Horng YS
Front Neurol; 2024; 15():1352365. PubMed ID: 38846043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Daily Life Benefits and Usage Characteristics of Dynamic Arm Supports in Subjects with Neuromuscular Disorders.
Essers J; Murgia A; Peters A; Meijer K
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(17):. PubMed ID: 32872138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships between accelerometry and general compensatory movements of the upper limb after stroke.
Barth J; Klaesner JW; Lang CE
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Oct; 17(1):138. PubMed ID: 33081783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Occupation-Based Bilateral Upper Extremity Training in a Medical Setting for Stroke Patients: A Single-Blinded, Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Kim SH; Park JH
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2019 Dec; 28(12):104335. PubMed ID: 31582271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of Clinically Important Changes in Actual and Perceived Functional Arm Use of the Affected Upper Limb After Rehabilitative Therapy in Chronic Stroke.
Li YC; Liao WW; Hsieh YW; Lin KC; Chen CL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Mar; 101(3):442-449. PubMed ID: 31563552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing Epoch Length and Activity Count Threshold Parameters in Accelerometry: Enhancing Upper Extremity Use Quantification in Cerebral Palsy.
Poitras I; Gagné-Pelletier L; Clouâtre J; Flamand VH; Campeau-Lecours A; Mercier C
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Feb; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 38400258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Scales Reported in Stroke Trials: A Review.
Mishra B; Sudheer P; Agarwal A; Nilima N; Srivastava MVP; Vishnu VY
Brain Sci; 2024 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 38248295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes Associated with a Single Joystick-Operated Ride-on-Toy Navigation Training Incorporated into a Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Program: A Pilot Feasibility Study.
Srinivasan S; Amonkar N; Kumavor P; Morgan K; Bubela D
Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37232651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From Meaningful Outcomes to Meaningful Change Thresholds: A Path to Progress for Establishing Digital Endpoints.
Mc Carthy M; Burrows K; Griffiths P; Black PM; Demanuele C; Karlsson N; Buenconsejo J; Patel N; Chen WH; Cappelleri JC
Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2023 Jul; 57(4):629-645. PubMed ID: 37020160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suitability of accelerometry as an objective measure for upper extremity use in stroke patients.
Heye AL; Kersting C; Kneer M; Barzel A
BMC Neurol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):220. PubMed ID: 35705906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of Movement in Stroke Patients under Free Living Conditions Using Wearable Sensors: A Systematic Review.
Bernaldo de Quirós M; Douma EH; van den Akker-Scheek I; Lamoth CJC; Maurits NM
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of wearable sensors to assess and treat the upper extremity after stroke: a scoping review.
Kim GJ; Parnandi A; Eva S; Schambra H
Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Oct; 44(20):6119-6138. PubMed ID: 34328803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Sensor Placement and Number on Physical Activity Recognition and Energy Expenditure Estimation in Older Adults: Validation Study.
Davoudi A; Mardini MT; Nelson D; Albinali F; Ranka S; Rashidi P; Manini TM
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 May; 9(5):e23681. PubMed ID: 33938809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Novel Combination of Accelerometry and Ecological Momentary Assessment for Post-Stroke Paretic Arm/Hand Use: Feasibility and Validity.
Chen YA; Demers M; Lewthwaite R; Schweighofer N; Monterosso JR; Fisher BE; Winstein C
J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 33807014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving Accelerometry-Based Measurement of Functional Use of the Upper Extremity After Stroke: Machine Learning Versus Counts Threshold Method.
Lum PS; Shu L; Bochniewicz EM; Tran T; Chang LC; Barth J; Dromerick AW
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2020 Dec; 34(12):1078-1087. PubMed ID: 33150830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study of predictive validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of arm accelerometer in real-world activity of patients with chronic stroke.
Chen HL; Lin KC; Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Liing RJ; Chen CL
Clin Rehabil; 2018 Jan; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 28580791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity, responsiveness, and clinically important difference of the ABILHAND questionnaire in patients with stroke.
Wang TN; Lin KC; Wu CY; Chung CY; Pei YC; Teng YK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1086-91. PubMed ID: 21704789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
