234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28580867)
1. Impact of perioperative anticoagulation on artificial urinary sphincter device survival.
Blackburne AT; Linder BJ; Elliott DS
Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):339-341. PubMed ID: 28580867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation.
Sayedahmed K; Olianas R; Kaftan B; Omar M; El Shazly M; Burger M; Mayr R; Rosenhammer B
World J Urol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):183-191. PubMed ID: 30980093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction?
Bugeja S; Ivaz SL; Frost A; Andrich DE; Mundy AR
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 26384584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter failure.
Kretschmer A; Buchner A; Grabbert M; Stief CG; Pavlicek M; Bauer RM
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):595-602. PubMed ID: 26253655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Management of urethral atrophy after implantation of artificial urinary sphincter: what are the weaknesses?
Heah NH; Tan RBW
Asian J Androl; 2020; 22(1):60-63. PubMed ID: 31736473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence.
Léon P; Chartier-Kastler E; Rouprêt M; Ambrogi V; Mozer P; Phé V
BJU Int; 2015 Jun; 115(6):951-7. PubMed ID: 24958004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dorsolateral fibromuscular tissue preservation during artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with low infection and erosion rates.
Cheung F; Fathollahi A; Vertosick E; Jarvis TR; Katz D; Sandhu JS
BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):328-334. PubMed ID: 29972627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter.
Raj GV; Peterson AC; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1242-5. PubMed ID: 15758761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in 11 women with urinary stress incontinence: surgical technique and initial experience.
Biardeau X; Rizk J; Marcelli F; Flamand V
Eur Urol; 2015 May; 67(5):937-42. PubMed ID: 25582931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Small intestinal submucosa urethral wrap at the time of artificial urinary sphincter placement as a salvage treatment option for patients with persistent/recurrent incontinence following multiple prior sphincter failures and erosions.
Trost L; Elliott D
Urology; 2012 Apr; 79(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 22119252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early Revision after Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Does Not Impair the Long-Term Treatment Success.
Sayedahmed K; Rosenhammer B; Burger M; Goßler C
Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34289484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can time to failure predict the faulty component in artificial urinary sphincter device malfunctions?
Yang DY; Linder BJ; Miller AR; Rangel LJ; Elliott DS
Int J Urol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):146-150. PubMed ID: 29178540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk Factors for Failure of Male Slings and Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Results from a Large Middle European Cohort Study.
Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Thomsen F; Kronlachner D; Kurosch M; Obaje A; Anding R; Pottek T; Rose A; Olianas R; Friedl A; Hübner W; Homberg R; Pfitzenmaier J; Grein U; Queissert F; Naumann CM; Schweiger J; Wotzka C; Nyarangi-Dix J; Hofmann T; Ulm K; Bauer RM; Haferkamp A;
Urol Int; 2017; 99(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 27598774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800™) implantation in women aged over 75 years and suffering from stress urinary incontinence caused by intrinsic sphincter deficiency.
Denormandie A; Chartier-Kastler E; Haddad R; Robain G; Guillot-Tantay C; Phé V
World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3897-3902. PubMed ID: 33938979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
Alwaal A; Harris CR; Awad MA; Allen IE; Breyer BN
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1571-6. PubMed ID: 27417131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proof of concept: Exposing the myth of urethral atrophy after artificial urinary sphincter via assessment of circumferential recovery after capsulotomy and intraoperative pressure profiling of the pressure regulating balloon.
Pearlman AM; Rasper AM; Terlecki RP
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Jul; 59(4):275-279. PubMed ID: 29984343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Urethral Risk Factors on Transcorporeal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosion Rates and Device Survival.
Mock S; Dmochowski RR; Brown ET; Reynolds WS; Kaufman MR; Milam DF
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26141851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective follow-up study of artificial urinary sphincter placement preserving the bulbospongiosus muscle.
Collado Serra A; Domínguez-Escrig J; Gómez-Ferrer Á; Batista Miranda E; Rubio-Briones J; Solsona Narbón E
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Jun; 36(5):1387-1394. PubMed ID: 27654121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress urinary incontinence in female neurological patients: long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800
Phé V; Léon P; Granger B; Denys P; Bitker MO; Mozer P; Chartier-Kastler E
Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Mar; 36(3):764-769. PubMed ID: 27080729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
