284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28581249)
1. The robotic ENT microsurgery system: A novel robotic platform for microvascular surgery.
Feng AL; Razavi CR; Lakshminarayanan P; Ashai Z; Olds K; Balicki M; Gooi Z; Day AT; Taylor RH; Richmon JD
Laryngoscope; 2017 Nov; 127(11):2495-2500. PubMed ID: 28581249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microvascular anastomosis simulation using a chicken thigh model: Interval versus massed training.
Schoeff S; Hernandez B; Robinson DJ; Jameson MJ; Shonka DC
Laryngoscope; 2017 Nov; 127(11):2490-2494. PubMed ID: 28407264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Real-time robotic airway measurement: An additional benefit of a novel steady-hand robotic platform.
Razavi CR; Creighton FX; Wilkening PR; Peine J; Taylor RH; Akst LM
Laryngoscope; 2019 Feb; 129(2):324-329. PubMed ID: 30443933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic microlaryngeal phonosurgery: Testing of a "steady-hand" microsurgery platform.
Akst LM; Olds KC; Balicki M; Chalasani P; Taylor RH
Laryngoscope; 2018 Jan; 128(1):126-132. PubMed ID: 28498632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transfer of training in robotic-assisted microvascular surgery.
Karamanoukian RL; Bui T; McConnell MP; Evans GR; Karamanoukian HL
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):662-5. PubMed ID: 17122554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic-assisted microvascular surgery: skill acquisition in a rat model.
Clarke NS; Price J; Boyd T; Salizzoni S; Zehr KJ; Nieponice A; Bajona P
J Robot Surg; 2018 Jun; 12(2):331-336. PubMed ID: 28812257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microvascular training of medical students and surgeons - a comparative prospective study.
Mücke T; Borgmann A; Ritschl LM; Kesting MR; Loeffelbein DJ; Wolff KD
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):e187-90. PubMed ID: 23402732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applied Force during Piston Prosthesis Placement in a 3D-Printed Model: Freehand vs Robot-Assisted Techniques.
Razavi CR; Wilkening PR; Yin R; Lamaison N; Taylor RH; Carey JP; Creighton FX
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Feb; 160(2):320-325. PubMed ID: 30509152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acquisition of basic microsurgery skills using home-based simulation training: A randomised control study.
Malik MM; Hachach-Haram N; Tahir M; Al-Musabi M; Masud D; Mohanna PN
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Apr; 70(4):478-486. PubMed ID: 28161208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and Evaluation of a Simulation Model for Microvascular Anastomosis Training.
Willis RE; Wiersch J; Adams AJ; Al Fayyadh MJ; Weber RA; Wang HT
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 Sep; 33(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 28472839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of microvascular anastomosis training in otolaryngology residencies: survey of United States program directors.
Luginbuhl A; Pribitkin E; Krein H; Heffelfinger R
Laryngoscope; 2010; 120 Suppl 4():S233. PubMed ID: 21225831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of microvascular anastomosis training in otolaryngology residencies: survey of United States program directors.
Luginbuhl AJ; Pribitkin EA; Krein H; Heffelfinger RN
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Nov; 143(5):633-6. PubMed ID: 20974331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anastomosis Lapse Index (ALI): A Validated End Product Assessment Tool for Simulation Microsurgery Training.
Ghanem AM; Al Omran Y; Shatta B; Kim E; Myers S
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2016 Mar; 32(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 26645156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy Biotissue Curriculum has Validity and Improves Technical Performance for Surgical Oncology Fellows.
Tam V; Zenati M; Novak S; Chen Y; Zureikat AH; Zeh HJ; Hogg ME
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):1057-1065. PubMed ID: 28578981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transfer of Learning from Practicing Microvascular Anastomosis on Silastic Tubes to Rat Abdominal Aorta.
Mokhtari P; Tayebi Meybodi A; Lawton MT; Payman A; Benet A
World Neurosurg; 2017 Dec; 108():230-235. PubMed ID: 28867319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized evaluation of simulation training on performance of vascular anastomosis on a high-fidelity in vivo model: the role of deliberate practice.
Price J; Naik V; Boodhwani M; Brandys T; Hendry P; Lam BK
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 142(3):496-503. PubMed ID: 21742349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic microsurgery: validating an assessment tool and plotting the learning curve.
Alrasheed T; Liu J; Hanasono MM; Butler CE; Selber JC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Oct; 134(4):794-803. PubMed ID: 25357037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preclinical Experience Using a New Robotic System Created for Microsurgery.
van Mulken TJM; Boymans CAEM; Schols RM; Cau R; Schoenmakers FBF; Hoekstra LT; Qiu SS; Selber JC; van der Hulst RRWJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Nov; 142(5):1367-1376. PubMed ID: 30119108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic simulation experience in undergraduate medical education: a perspective.
Naik R; Mandal I
J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):793-794. PubMed ID: 32125601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microvascular anastomotic coupler application learning curve: A curriculum supporting further deliberate practice in ex-vivo simulation models.
Pafitanis G; Cooper L; Hadjiandreou M; Ghanem A; Myers S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 30501971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
