These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28581261)

  • 1. Statistical Data Editing in Scientific Articles.
    Habibzadeh F
    J Korean Med Sci; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 28581261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts.
    Harris A; Reeder R; Hyun J
    J Psychol; 2011; 145(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21560804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
    Galipeau J; Barbour V; Baskin P; Bell-Syer S; Cobey K; Cumpston M; Deeks J; Garner P; MacLehose H; Shamseer L; Straus S; Tugwell P; Wager E; Winker M; Moher D
    BMC Med; 2016 Feb; 14():16. PubMed ID: 26837937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.
    Suzuki K; Edelson A; Iversen LL; Hausmann L; Schulz JB; Turner AJ
    J Neurochem; 2016 Oct; 139 Suppl 2():17-23. PubMed ID: 27534728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'How to count sperm properly': checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis.
    Björndahl L; Barratt CL; Mortimer D; Jouannet P
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 26682580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Narrative Review of Statistical Reporting Checklists, Mandatory Statistical Editing, and Rectifying Common Problems in the Reporting of Scientific Articles.
    Dexter F; Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Mar; 124(3):943-947. PubMed ID: 27676281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness.
    Henly SJ; Bennett JA; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):188-99. PubMed ID: 20637932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL EDITORS' VIEWS ON REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE.
    Oehrlein EM; Graff JS; Perfetto EM; Mullins CD; Dubois RW; Anyanwu C; Onukwugha E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 29415784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: results of a questionnaire survey of editors.
    Katz KA; Crawford GH; Lu DW; Kantor J; Margolis DJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Aug; 51(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 15280842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When, Where, and a Sixth, So What?
    Vetter TR
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Nov; 125(5):1797-1802. PubMed ID: 28891910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Statistics must be seen and scrutinized! Fundamental to the progress of medical science--yet neglected in medical journals].
    Taube A
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(51-52):5176-9. PubMed ID: 12572313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Poor title--poor manuscript?
    Gjersvik P; Gulbrandsen P; Aasheim ET; Nylenna M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Dec; 133(23-24):2475-7. PubMed ID: 24326496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice.
    Diong J; Butler AA; Gandevia SC; Héroux ME
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202121. PubMed ID: 30110371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].
    Maisonneuve H
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.