These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28582033)

  • 1. Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Clinical Outcomes and Considerations.
    Capodanno D
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2016 Jul; 5(3):357-363. PubMed ID: 28582033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: Clinical outcomes from randomized controlled trials.
    Rizik DG; Hermiller JB; Kereiakes DJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(S1):21-30. PubMed ID: 27797464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paving the way to a bioresorbable technology: Development of the absorb BRS program.
    Perkins LE; Kossuth MB; Fox JC; Rapoza RJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(S1):1-9. PubMed ID: 27797462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in left main coronary artery disease.
    Everaert B; Capranzano P; Tamburino C; Seth A; van Geuns RJ
    EuroIntervention; 2015; 11 Suppl V():V135-8. PubMed ID: 25983148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current perspectives on the role of bioresorbable scaffolds in the management of coronary artery disease.
    Dziewierz A; Dudek D
    Kardiol Pol; 2018; 76(7):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 30251247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcomes following bifurcation double-stenting with bioresorbable scaffolds.
    Tanaka A; Latib A; Kawamoto H; Jabbour RJ; Mangieri A; Pagnesi M; Montalto C; Regazzoli D; Ancona M; Chieffo A; Carlino M; Montorfano M; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):854-862. PubMed ID: 27184769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro mechanical behavior and in vivo healing response of a novel thin-strut ultrahigh molecular weight poly-l-lactic acid sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold in normal swine.
    Cheng Y; Gasior P; Ramzipoor K; Lee C; McGregor JC; Conditt GB; McAndrew T; Kaluza GL; Granada JF
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Jul; 286():21-28. PubMed ID: 30967275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of overlapping on 1-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implantation in routine clinical practice: Insights from the European multicenter GHOST-EU registry.
    Ortega-Paz L; Capodanno D; Giacchi G; Gori T; Nef H; Latib A; Caramanno G; Di Mario C; Naber C; Lesiak M; Capranzano P; Wiebe J; Mehilli J; Araszkiewicz A; Pyxaras S; Mattesini A; Geraci S; Naganuma T; Colombo A; Münzel T; Sabaté M; Tamburino C; Brugaletta S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Apr; 89(5):812-818. PubMed ID: 27515568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: design, clinical trials, and current applications.
    Devito F; Zito A; Dachille A; Carbonara R; Giardinelli F; Bulzis G; Navarese EP; Scicchitano P; Gaglione A; Masi F; Ciccone MM
    Coron Artery Dis; 2016 Mar; 27(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 26717005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.
    Tamburino C; Capranzano P; Gori T; Latib A; Lesiak M; Nef H; Caramanno G; Naber C; Mehilli J; Di Mario C; Sabaté M; Münzel T; Colombo A; Araszkiewicz A; Wiebe J; Geraci S; Jensen C; Mattesini A; Brugaletta S; Capodanno D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(5):440-9. PubMed ID: 26875648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current perspectives on bioresorbable scaffolds in coronary intervention and other fields.
    Wu X; Wu S; Kawashima H; Hara H; Ono M; Gao C; Wang R; Lunardi M; Sharif F; Wijns W; Serruys PW; Onuma Y
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Apr; 18(4):351-365. PubMed ID: 33739213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenges of the newer generation of resorbable magnesium scaffolds: Lessons from failure mechanisms of the past generation.
    Seguchi M; Aytekin A; Lenz T; Nicol P; Alvarez-Covarrubias HA; Xhepa E; Klosterman GR; Beele A; Sabic E; Utsch L; Alyaqoob A; Joner M
    J Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 81(2):179-188. PubMed ID: 36122642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design Principles of Bioresorbable Polymeric Scaffolds.
    Kossuth MB; Perkins LEL; Rapoza RJ
    Interv Cardiol Clin; 2016 Jul; 5(3):349-355. PubMed ID: 28582032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; van Geuns RJ; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Christiansen E; Smits PC; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia HM; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1400-11. PubMed ID: 25523532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The unmet needs: How future technologies will address current limitations of bioresorbable scaffold technology.
    Abizaid A; Ribamar Costa J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(S1):54-59. PubMed ID: 27797459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: From patient selection to optimal scaffold implantation; tips and tricks to minimize device failure.
    Tanaka A; Jabbour RJ; Latib A; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(S1):10-20. PubMed ID: 27797460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Facing Old Problems, Raising New Hopes.
    Masiero G; Rodinò G; Boiago M; Matsuda Y; Tarantini G
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2021 Jan; 23(3):15. PubMed ID: 33495895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Latest generation stents: is it time to revive the bioresorbable scaffold?
    Buono A; Ielasi A; Colombo A
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2020 Oct; 68(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 32643897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. State of the art: the inception, advent and future of fully bioresorbable scaffolds.
    Katagiri Y; Stone GW; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Aug; 13(6):734-750. PubMed ID: 28844034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
    Puricel S; Arroyo D; Corpataux N; Baeriswyl G; Lehmann S; Kallinikou Z; Muller O; Allard L; Stauffer JC; Togni M; Goy JJ; Cook S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 65(8):791-801. PubMed ID: 25720622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.