These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28582535)

  • 21. Visual sensitivity to a conspicuous male cue varies by reproductive state in Physalaemus pustulosus females.
    Cummings ME; Bernal XE; Reynaga R; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Apr; 211(Pt 8):1203-10. PubMed ID: 18375844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Animal communication: complex call production in the túngara frog.
    Gridi-Papp M; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7089):38. PubMed ID: 16672962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Harmonic calls and indifferent females: no preference for human consonance in an anuran.
    Akre KL; Bernal X; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 281(1789):20140986. PubMed ID: 24990679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Fox JH; Wilczynski W; Rand AS
    Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6253):66-7. PubMed ID: 2296291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Complexity increases working memory for mating signals.
    Akre KL; Ryan MJ
    Curr Biol; 2010 Mar; 20(6):502-5. PubMed ID: 20206525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evoked vocal response in male túngara frogs: pre-existing biases in male responses?
    Ryan MJ; Rand AS
    Anim Behav; 1998 Dec; 56(6):1509-1516. PubMed ID: 9933549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Squirrel monkey chuck call: vocal response to playback chucks based on acoustic structure and affiliative relationship with the caller.
    Soltis J; Bernhards D; Donkin H; Newman JD
    Am J Primatol; 2002 Jul; 57(3):119-30. PubMed ID: 12111678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Crossmodal comparisons of signal components allow for relative-distance assessment.
    Halfwerk W; Page RA; Taylor RC; Wilson PS; Ryan MJ
    Curr Biol; 2014 Aug; 24(15):1751-5. PubMed ID: 25042586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patterns of mating call preferences in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Ryan MJ; Bernal XE; Rand AS
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Nov; 20(6):2235-47. PubMed ID: 17956386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sound Classification and Call Discrimination Are Decoded in Order as Revealed by Event-Related Potential Components in Frogs.
    Fang G; Yang P; Xue F; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    Brain Behav Evol; 2015; 86(3-4):232-45. PubMed ID: 26613526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multisensory modalities increase working memory for mating signals in a treefrog.
    Zhu B; Zhou Y; Yang Y; Deng K; Wang T; Wang J; Tang Y; Ryan MJ; Cui J
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Jun; 90(6):1455-1465. PubMed ID: 33666233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Generalization in response to mate recognition signals.
    Ryan MJ; Rand W; Hurd PL; Phelps SM; Rand AS
    Am Nat; 2003 Mar; 161(3):380-94. PubMed ID: 12699219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interactions of multisensory components perceptually rescue túngara frog mating signals.
    Taylor RC; Ryan MJ
    Science; 2013 Jul; 341(6143):273-4. PubMed ID: 23744778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The development of sexual behavior in túngara frogs (Physalaemus pustulosus).
    Baugh AT; Ryan MJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Feb; 124(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 20175598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. History influences signal recognition: neural network models of túngara frogs.
    Phelps SM; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Aug; 267(1453):1633-9. PubMed ID: 11467426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of spatially separated call components on phonotaxis in túngara frogs: evidence for auditory grouping.
    Farris HE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Brain Behav Evol; 2002; 60(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 12417822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in túngara frogs.
    Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 276(1660):1323-9. PubMed ID: 19141428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Environmental conditions limit attractiveness of a complex sexual signal in the túngara frog.
    Halfwerk W; Smit JAH; Loning H; Lea AM; Geipel I; Ellers J; Ryan MJ
    Nat Commun; 2017 Dec; 8(1):1891. PubMed ID: 29192162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acoustic radiation patterns of mating calls of the tungara frog (Physalaemus pustuosus): implications for multiple receivers.
    Bernal XE; Page RA; Ryan MJ; Argo TF; Wilson PS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2757-67. PubMed ID: 19894851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae).
    Hepp F; Pombal JPJ
    Zootaxa; 2020 Jan; 4725(1):zootaxa.4725.1.1. PubMed ID: 32230594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.