These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28582733)

  • 1. Predicting the fate of micropollutants during wastewater treatment: Calibration and sensitivity analysis.
    Baalbaki Z; Torfs E; Yargeau V; Vanrolleghem PA
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 601-602():874-885. PubMed ID: 28582733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic modelling of solids in a full-scale activated sludge plant preceded by CEPT as a preliminary step for micropollutant removal modelling.
    Baalbaki Z; Torfs E; Maere T; Yargeau V; Vanrolleghem PA
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2017 Apr; 40(4):499-510. PubMed ID: 28013379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling of micropollutant removal in full-scale membrane bioreactors: calibration and operations to limit the emissions.
    Lejeune A; Choubert JM
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2019 Nov; 42(11):1879-1892. PubMed ID: 31385036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling of micropollutant removal in biological wastewater treatments: a review.
    Pomiès M; Choubert JM; Wisniewski C; Coquery M
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jan; 443():733-48. PubMed ID: 23228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biotic phase micropollutant distribution in horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetlands.
    Petrie B; Rood S; Smith BD; Proctor K; Youdan J; Barden R; Kasprzyk-Hordern B
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 630():648-657. PubMed ID: 29494973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modelling cometabolic biotransformation of organic micropollutants in nitrifying reactors.
    Fernandez-Fontaina E; Carballa M; Omil F; Lema JM
    Water Res; 2014 Nov; 65():371-83. PubMed ID: 25150522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Large scale micropollutants and lipids screening in the sludge layers and the ecosystem of a vertical flow constructed wetland.
    Maurer L; Villette C; Zumsteg J; Wanko A; Heintz D
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Dec; 746():141196. PubMed ID: 32771759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing potential modifications to the activated sludge process to improve simultaneous removal of a diverse range of micropollutants.
    Petrie B; McAdam EJ; Lester JN; Cartmell E
    Water Res; 2014 Oct; 62():180-92. PubMed ID: 24956600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proposal for a screening test to evaluate the fate of organic micropollutants in activated sludge.
    Salvetti R; Vismara R; Dal Ben I; Gorla E; Romele L
    Environ Technol; 2011 Apr; 32(5-6):653-61. PubMed ID: 21877546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fugacity modelling of the fate of micropollutants in aqueous systems - Uncertainty and sensitivity issues.
    Wang Y; Fan L; Khan SJ; Roddick FA
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jan; 699():134249. PubMed ID: 31522051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Super-fine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) for efficient removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent.
    Bonvin F; Jost L; Randin L; Bonvin E; Kohn T
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():90-99. PubMed ID: 26724443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review on the fate of organic micropollutants in wastewater treatment and water reuse with membranes.
    Siegrist H; Joss A
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 22828319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new dynamic model for bioavailability and cometabolism of micropollutants during anaerobic digestion.
    Delgadillo-Mirquez L; Lardon L; Steyer JP; Patureau D
    Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(15):4511-21. PubMed ID: 21719065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Micropollutant and sludge characterization for modeling sorption equilibria.
    Barret M; Carrère H; Latrille E; Wisniewski C; Patureau D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 44(3):1100-6. PubMed ID: 20055462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal and fate of micropollutants in a sponge-based moving bed bioreactor.
    Luo Y; Guo W; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Kang J; Xia S; Zhang Z; Price WE
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 May; 159():311-9. PubMed ID: 24658104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Significance of settling model structures and parameter subsets in modelling WWTPs under wet-weather flow and filamentous bulking conditions.
    Ramin E; Sin G; Mikkelsen PS; Plósz BG
    Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():209-21. PubMed ID: 25003213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Steady-state analysis of activated sludge processes with a settler model including sludge compression.
    Diehl S; Zambrano J; Carlsson B
    Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():104-116. PubMed ID: 26476681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of reactive settler models on simulated WWTP performance.
    Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U; Batstone DJ; Ingildsen P
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 53(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 16532746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kinetics of Biological Removal of the Selected Micropollutants and Their Effect on Activated Sludge Biomass.
    Liwarska-Bizukojc E; Galamon M; Bernat P
    Water Air Soil Pollut; 2018; 229(11):356. PubMed ID: 30416220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.