These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28582934)

  • 1. A new idea for visualization of lesions distribution in mammogram based on CPD registration method.
    Pan X; Qi B; Yu H; Wei H; Kang Y
    Technol Health Care; 2017 Jul; 25(S1):459-467. PubMed ID: 28582934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A similarity measure method combining location feature for mammogram retrieval.
    Wang Z; Xin J; Huang Y; Li C; Xu L; Li Y; Zhang H; Gu H; Qian W
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(4):553-571. PubMed ID: 29865106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms.
    Sanjay-Gopal S; Chan HP; Wilson T; Helvie M; Petrick N; Sahiner B
    Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 10619252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometry-Based Pectoral Muscle Segmentation From MLO Mammogram Views.
    Taghanaki SA; Liu Y; Miles B; Hamarneh G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Nov; 64(11):2662-2671. PubMed ID: 28129144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of methods for mammogram registration.
    van Engeland S; Snoeren P; Hendriks J; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Nov; 22(11):1436-44. PubMed ID: 14606677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms.
    Filev P; Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):515-29. PubMed ID: 15789598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
    Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast peripheral area correction in digital mammograms.
    Tortajada M; Oliver A; Martí R; Ganau S; Tortajada L; Sentís M; Freixenet J; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jul; 50():32-40. PubMed ID: 24845018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast Mass Detection in Digital Mammogram Based on Gestalt Psychology.
    Wang H; Feng J; Bu Q; Liu F; Zhang M; Ren Y; Lv Y
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():4015613. PubMed ID: 29854359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RAMS: Remote and automatic mammogram screening.
    Cogan T; Cogan M; Tamil L
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Apr; 107():18-29. PubMed ID: 30771549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast Cancer Diagnosis Method Based on Cross-Mammogram Four-View Interactive Learning.
    Wen X; Li J; Yang L
    Tomography; 2024 Jun; 10(6):848-868. PubMed ID: 38921942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform.
    Eltoukhy MM; Faye I; Samir BB
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20004076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A preliminary report on the role of spatial frequency analysis in the perception of breast cancers missed at mammography screening.
    Mello-Thoms C; Chapman B
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):894-908. PubMed ID: 15288040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A registration framework for the comparison of mammogram sequences.
    Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jun; 24(6):782-90. PubMed ID: 15957600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
    Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammogram registration: a phantom-based evaluation of compressed breast thickness variation effects.
    Richard FJ; Bakić PR; Maidment AD
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 16468453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated registration of breast lesions in temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis--local affine transformation for improved localization.
    Hadjiiski L; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1070-9. PubMed ID: 11439476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.