These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28582934)

  • 21. An anatomically oriented breast coordinate system for mammogram analysis.
    Brandt SS; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Nielsen M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1841-51. PubMed ID: 21609879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of compressed breast thickness and dose on lesion detectability in digital mammography: FROC study with simulated lesions in real mammograms.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Michielsen K; Cockmartin L; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5104. PubMed ID: 27587041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammogram segmentation using maximal cell strength updation in cellular automata.
    Anitha J; Peter JD
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Aug; 53(8):737-49. PubMed ID: 25841356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Review of Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Sequential Mammograms.
    Loizidou K; Skouroumouni G; Nikolaou C; Pitris C
    Tomography; 2022 Dec; 8(6):2874-2892. PubMed ID: 36548533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Registration and difference analysis of corresponding mammogram images.
    Sallam MY; Bowyer KW
    Med Image Anal; 1999 Jun; 3(2):103-18. PubMed ID: 10711993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A similarity measure method fusing deep feature for mammogram retrieval.
    Wang Z; Xin J; Huang Y; Xu L; Ren J; Zhang H; Qian W; Zhang X; Liu J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(1):17-33. PubMed ID: 31868727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new validation method for X-ray mammogram registration algorithms using a projection model of breast X-ray compression.
    Hipwell JH; Tanner C; Crum WR; Schnabel JA; Hawkes DJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1190-200. PubMed ID: 17896592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radial-searching contour extraction method based on a modified active contour model for mammographic masses.
    Nakagawa T; Hara T; Fujita H; Horita K; Iwase T; Endo T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jul; 1(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 20821141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
    Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms based on dual-threshold].
    Huang Q; He D; Wu Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 25(5):1189-92, 1205. PubMed ID: 19024473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammography segmentation with maximum likelihood active contours.
    Rahmati P; Adler A; Hamarneh G
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Aug; 16(6):1167-86. PubMed ID: 22831774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A probabilistic approach for breast boundary extraction in mammograms.
    Habibi Aghdam H; Puig D; Solanas A
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():408595. PubMed ID: 24324523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammogram-based discriminant fusion analysis for breast cancer diagnosis.
    Li JB; Wang YH; Tang LL
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):710-6. PubMed ID: 23153999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models.
    Ferrari RJ; Rangayyan RM; Desautels JE; Borges RA; Frère AF
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Mar; 42(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 15125150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images.
    Solves-Llorens JA; Rupérez MJ; Monserrat C; Feliu E; García M; Lloret M
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081903. PubMed ID: 25086534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
    Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal mammogram image registration using optimized curvilinear coordinates.
    Abdel-Nasser M; Moreno A; Puig D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 127():1-14. PubMed ID: 27000285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
    Lauria A
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.