183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28582938)
1. Effective mammogram classification based on center symmetric-LBP features in wavelet domain using random forests.
Singh VP; Srivastava S; Srivastava R
Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):709-727. PubMed ID: 28582938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. X-ray image classification using random forests with local wavelet-based CS-local binary patterns.
Ko BC; Kim SH; Nam JY
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Dec; 24(6):1141-51. PubMed ID: 21487837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated diagnosis of mammogram images of breast cancer using discrete wavelet transform and spherical wavelet transform features: a comparative study.
Ganesan K; Acharya UR; Chua CK; Min LC; Abraham TK
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Dec; 13(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 24000991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiresolution local binary pattern texture analysis combined with variable selection for application to false-positive reduction in computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
Choi JY; Ro YM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7029-52. PubMed ID: 23053352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Efficient Approach for Automated Mass Segmentation and Classification in Mammograms.
Dong M; Lu X; Ma Y; Guo Y; Ma Y; Wang K
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):613-25. PubMed ID: 25776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of statistical, LBP, and multi-resolution analysis features for breast mass classification.
Reyad YA; Berbar MA; Hussain M
J Med Syst; 2014 Sep; 38(9):100. PubMed ID: 25037713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aiding the Digital Mammogram for Detecting the Breast Cancer Using Shearlet Transform and Neural Network.
P S; R T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 19(9):2665-2671. PubMed ID: 30256567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A statistical based feature extraction method for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiresolution representation.
Meselhy Eltoukhy M; Faye I; Belhaouari Samir B
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 22115076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of methods for three-class mammograms classification.
Milosevic M; Jovanovic Z; Jankovic D
Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 28436405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
Vadivel A; Surendiran B
Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features.
Masotti M; Lanconelli N; Campanini R
Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 19291970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast microcalcifications based on dual-tree complex wavelet transform.
Jian W; Sun X; Luo S
Biomed Eng Online; 2012 Dec; 11():96. PubMed ID: 23253202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Improved CAD System for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on Generalized Pseudo-Zernike Moment and Ada-DEWNN Classifier.
Singh SP; Urooj S
J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):105. PubMed ID: 26892455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: a swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach.
Dheeba J; Albert Singh N; Tamil Selvi S
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Jun; 49():45-52. PubMed ID: 24509074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of support vector machine classification for computer aided detection of breast masses in mammography.
Lesniak JM; Hupse R; Blanc R; Karssemeijer N; Székely G
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(16):5295-307. PubMed ID: 22853938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of Anomalies in Mammograms through Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Diagnosis System.
Khan AR; Saba T; Sadad T; Nobanee H; Bahaj SA
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():1100775. PubMed ID: 36188701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison Analysis of Linear Discriminant Analysis and Cuckoo-Search Algorithm in the Classification of Breast Cancer from Digital Mammograms.
S R SC; Rajaguru H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Aug; 20(8):2333-2337. PubMed ID: 31450903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
