136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28583204)
1. Building a semantic web-based metadata repository for facilitating detailed clinical modeling in cancer genome studies.
Sharma DK; Solbrig HR; Tao C; Weng C; Chute CG; Jiang G
J Biomed Semantics; 2017 Jun; 8(1):19. PubMed ID: 28583204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Semantic Web technologies for the generation of domain-specific templates to support clinical study metadata standards.
Jiang G; Evans J; Endle CM; Solbrig HR; Chute CG
J Biomed Semantics; 2016; 7():10. PubMed ID: 26949508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Composite CDE: modeling composite relationships between common data elements for representing complex clinical data.
Kim HH; Park YR; Lee S; Kim JH
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jul; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 32620117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standardized Representation of Clinical Study Data Dictionaries with CIMI Archetypes.
Sharma DK; Solbrig HR; Prud'hommeaux E; Pathak J; Jiang G
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2016; 2016():1119-1128. PubMed ID: 28269909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mapping clinical phenotype data elements to standardized metadata repositories and controlled terminologies: the eMERGE Network experience.
Pathak J; Wang J; Kashyap S; Basford M; Li R; Masys DR; Chute CG
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(4):376-86. PubMed ID: 21597104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Representation of Time-Relevant Common Data Elements in the Cancer Data Standards Repository: Statistical Evaluation of an Ontological Approach.
Chen HW; Du J; Song HY; Liu X; Jiang G; Tao C
JMIR Med Inform; 2018 Feb; 6(1):e7. PubMed ID: 29472179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality Assurance of Cancer Study Common Data Elements Using A Post-Coordination Approach.
Jiang G; Solbrig HR; Prud'hommeaux E; Tao C; Weng C; Chute CG
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2015; 2015():659-68. PubMed ID: 26958201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A federated semantic metadata registry framework for enabling interoperability across clinical research and care domains.
Sinaci AA; Laleci Erturkmen GB
J Biomed Inform; 2013 Oct; 46(5):784-94. PubMed ID: 23751263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FAIR-compliant clinical, radiomics and DICOM metadata of RIDER, interobserver, Lung1 and head-Neck1 TCIA collections.
Kalendralis P; Shi Z; Traverso A; Choudhury A; Sloep M; Zhovannik I; Starmans MPA; Grittner D; Feltens P; Monshouwer R; Klein S; Fijten R; Aerts H; Dekker A; van Soest J; Wee L
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5931-5940. PubMed ID: 32521049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards a semantic medical Web: HealthCyberMap's tool for building an RDF metadata base of health information resources based on the Qualified Dublin Core Metadata Set.
Boulos MN; Roudsari AV; Carson ER
Med Sci Monit; 2002 Jul; 8(7):MT124-36. PubMed ID: 12118210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ODMedit: uniform semantic annotation for data integration in medicine based on a public metadata repository.
Dugas M; Meidt A; Neuhaus P; Storck M; Varghese J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():65. PubMed ID: 27245222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality evaluation of value sets from cancer study common data elements using the UMLS semantic groups.
Jiang G; Solbrig HR; Chute CG
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012 Jun; 19(e1):e129-36. PubMed ID: 22511016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. caCORE: a common infrastructure for cancer informatics.
Covitz PA; Hartel F; Schaefer C; De Coronado S; Fragoso G; Sahni H; Gustafson S; Buetow KH
Bioinformatics; 2003 Dec; 19(18):2404-12. PubMed ID: 14668224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metadata mapping and reuse in caBIG.
Kunz I; Lin MC; Frey L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Feb; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S4. PubMed ID: 19208192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pragmatic MDR: a metadata repository with bottom-up standardization of medical metadata through reuse.
Hegselmann S; Storck M; Gessner S; Neuhaus P; Varghese J; Bruland P; Meidt A; Mertens C; Riepenhausen S; Baier S; Stöcker B; Henke J; Schmidt CO; Dugas M
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 34001121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An exploratory study using an openEHR 2-level modeling approach to represent common data elements.
Lin CH; Fann YC; Liou DM
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Sep; 23(5):956-67. PubMed ID: 26911823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Common data element (CDE) management and deployment in clinical trials.
Warzel DB; Andonydis C; McCurry B; Chilukuri R; Ishmukhamedov S; Covitz P
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003(2003):1048. PubMed ID: 14728551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Achieving interoperability for metadata registries using comparative object modeling.
Park YR; Kim JH
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 2):1136-9. PubMed ID: 20841861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detailed clinical models: representing knowledge, data and semantics in healthcare information technology.
Goossen WT
Healthc Inform Res; 2014 Jul; 20(3):163-72. PubMed ID: 25152829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A metadata approach for clinical data management in translational genomics studies in breast cancer.
Papatheodorou I; Crichton C; Morris L; Maccallum P; ; Davies J; Brenton JD; Caldas C
BMC Med Genomics; 2009 Nov; 2():66. PubMed ID: 19948017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
