124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28583622)
1. Current CT practice in Germany: Results and implications of a nationwide survey.
Schegerer AA; Nagel HD; Stamm G; Adam G; Brix G
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():114-128. PubMed ID: 28583622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Reference Levels for computed tomography in Austria: A 2018 nationwide survey on adult patients.
Wachabauer D; Röthlin F; Moshammer HM; Homolka P
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108863. PubMed ID: 32062330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survey of computed tomography scanners in Taiwan: dose descriptors, dose guidance levels, and effective doses.
Tsai HY; Tung CJ; Yu CC; Tyan YS
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1234-43. PubMed ID: 17500455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paediatric CT scan usage and referrals of children to computed tomography in Germany--a cross-sectional survey of medical practice and awareness of radiation related health risks among physicians.
Merzenich H; Krille L; Hammer G; Kaiser M; Yamashita S; Zeeb H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Feb; 12():47. PubMed ID: 22364554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing radiation exposure for CT localizer radiographs.
Bohrer E; Schäfer S; Mäder U; Noël PB; Krombach GA; Fiebich M
Z Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 27(2):145-158. PubMed ID: 27720574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose Optimization for Computed Tomography Localizer Radiographs for Low-Dose Lung Computed Tomography Examinations.
Schmidt BT; Hupfer M; Saltybaeva N; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Invest Radiol; 2017 Feb; 52(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 27518213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variation in pediatric head CT imaging protocols in Washington state.
Kanal KM; Vavilala MS; Raelson C; Mohan A; Cohen W; Jarvik J; Rivara FP; Stewart BK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Apr; 8(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 21458762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survey of conventional and spiral ct doses.
Hidajat N; Wolf M; Nunnemann A; Liersch P; Gebauer B; Teichgräber U; Schröder RJ; Felix R
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 11161152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A simple method for estimating effective dose in dental CT. Conversion factors and calculation examples for a clinical low dose protocol].
Homolka P; Gahleitner A; Kudler H; Nowotny R
Rofo; 2001 Jun; 173(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 11471298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Embryo dose estimates in body CT.
Huda W; Randazzo W; Tipnis S; Frey GD; Mah E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):874-80. PubMed ID: 20308485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry to Evaluate Practice Patterns and Radiation Dose Estimates of Pediatric Body CT.
Wildman-Tobriner B; Strauss KJ; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Kadom N; Vock P; Applegate KE; Frush DP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):641-647. PubMed ID: 29323552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose reduction efforts for pediatric head CT imaging in Washington State trauma centers: follow-up survey results.
Graves JM; Kanal KM; Rivara FP; Jarvik JG; Vavilala MS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):161-168.e3. PubMed ID: 24360905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Results of the Austrian CT dose study 2010: typical effective doses of the most frequent CT examinations].
Homolka P; Leithner R; Billinger J; Gruber M
Z Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 24(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 24440650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey.
Brix G; Nagel HD; Stamm G; Veit R; Lechel U; Griebel J; Galanski M
Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):1979-91. PubMed ID: 12687286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effective radiation doses of CT examinations in Japan: a nationwide questionnaire-based study.
Matsunaga Y; Kawaguchi A; Kobayashi K; Kobayashi M; Asada Y; Minami K; Suzuki S; Chida K
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150671. PubMed ID: 26647804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing Dose-Length Product-Based and Monte Carlo Simulation Organ-Based Calculations of Effective Dose in 16- and 64-MDCT Examinations Using Automatic Tube Current Modulation.
Haji-Momenian S; Ellenbogen A; Khati N; Taffel M; Earls J; Miller G; Zeman RK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):583-592. PubMed ID: 29381379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
Francone M; Napoli A; Carbone I; Cavacece M; Nardis PG; Lanciotti K; Visconti S; Bertoletti L; Di Castro E; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Over-scanning in chest CT: Comparison of practice among six hospitals and its impact on radiation dose.
Schwartz F; Stieltjes B; Szucs-Farkas Z; Euler A
Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():49-54. PubMed ID: 29685544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
