207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28583639)
1. CT and MRI findings of type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer.
Liu D; Zhang L; Indima N; Peng K; Li Q; Hua T; Tang G
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():225-233. PubMed ID: 28583639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of borderline tumors from type I ovarian epithelial cancers on CT and MR imaging.
Yang S; Tang H; Xiao F; Zhu J; Hua T; Tang G
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Oct; 45(10):3230-3238. PubMed ID: 32162020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between types I and II epithelial ovarian cancer using histogram analysis of monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion models.
Wang F; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Liu C; Xie L; Zhou Z; Liang D; Shen Y; Yao Z; Liu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1797-1809. PubMed ID: 28379611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of DCE-MRI in assessing histopathological and molecular biological features in induced rat epithelial ovarian carcinomas.
Yuan SJ; Qiao TK; Qiang JW; Cai SQ; Li RK
J Ovarian Res; 2017 Sep; 10(1):65. PubMed ID: 28950890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative analysis of the MRI features in the differentiation of benign, borderline, and malignant epithelial ovarian tumors.
Xiao F; Zhang L; Yang S; Peng K; Hua T; Tang G
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):13. PubMed ID: 35062992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A predictive model combining human epididymal protein 4 and radiologic features for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Stiekema A; Lok CA; Kenter GG; van Driel WJ; Vincent AD; Korse CM
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):573-7. PubMed ID: 24418200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined model to predict histologic subtypes.
Qian L; Ren J; Liu A; Gao Y; Hao F; Zhao L; Wu H; Niu G
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5815-5825. PubMed ID: 32535738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of contrast-enhanced dual-energy spectral CT for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumours.
Han X; Li B; Sun M; Li J; Li Y; Liu A
Clin Radiol; 2021 Aug; 76(8):585-592. PubMed ID: 34059294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed tomography-based radiomics machine learning classifiers to differentiate type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancers.
Li J; Li X; Ma J; Wang F; Cui S; Ye Z
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jul; 33(7):5193-5204. PubMed ID: 36515713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and ultrasound features of type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer.
Alcázar JL; Utrilla-Layna J; Mínguez JÁ; Jurado M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 May; 23(4):680-4. PubMed ID: 23502452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonographic markers and preoperative CA-125 to distinguish between borderline ovarian tumors and stage I ovarian cancer.
Zacharakis D; Thomakos N; Biliatis I; Rodolakis A; Simou M; Daskalakis G; Bamias A; Antsaklis A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Mar; 92(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 23193945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of human epididymis protein 4 compared to a combination of biophysical and biochemical markers to differentiate ovarian endometriosis from epithelial ovarian cancer in premenopausal women.
Nikolova T; Zivadinovic R; Evtimovska N; Klisarovska V; Stanojevic M; Georgievska J; Nikolova N
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1870-1879. PubMed ID: 29027715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of in vitro chemoresponse profiles in women with Type I and Type II epithelial ovarian cancers: An observational study ancillary analysis.
Previs R; Leath CA; Coleman RL; Herzog TJ; Krivak TC; Brower SL; Tian C; Secord AA
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 26037898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful?
Montagnana M; Danese E; Ruzzenente O; Bresciani V; Nuzzo T; Gelati M; Salvagno GL; Franchi M; Lippi G; Guidi GC
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Mar; 49(3):521-5. PubMed ID: 21288178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumors.
Li HM; Feng F; Qiang JW; Zhang GF; Zhao SH; Ma FH; Li YA; Gu WY
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):3132-3141. PubMed ID: 29556691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
González García B; García Vicente AM; Jiménez Londoño GA; Pena Pardo FJ; Bellón Guardia ME; Talavera Rubio MP; Palomar Muñoz A; Gómez Herrero P; Soriano Castrejón ÁM
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2017; 36(4):233-240. PubMed ID: 28284928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging findings for discriminating clear cell carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary.
Morioka S; Kawaguchi R; Yamada Y; Iwai K; Yoshimoto C; Kobayashi H
J Ovarian Res; 2019 Feb; 12(1):20. PubMed ID: 30803452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI for discriminating metastatic ovarian tumors from primary epithelial ovarian cancers.
Xu Y; Yang J; Zhang Z; Zhang G
J Ovarian Res; 2015 Aug; 8():61. PubMed ID: 26310488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of the biomarkers HE4 and CA125 in type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer.
Kristjansdottir B; Levan K; Partheen K; Sundfeldt K
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 131(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 23891789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI features and score for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors.
Li YA; Qiang JW; Ma FH; Li HM; Zhao SH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():136-142. PubMed ID: 29279152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
