These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28584350)

  • 1. A randomised comparative study of Miller laryngoscope blade versus Oxiport
    Dias R; Dave N; Chhabria R; Shah H; Garasia M
    Indian J Anaesth; 2017 May; 61(5):404-409. PubMed ID: 28584350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of Truview infant EVO2 laryngoscope with the Miller blade in neonates and infants.
    Singh R; Singh P; Vajifdar H
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Apr; 19(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 19335346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The McCoy straight blade does not improve laryngoscopy and intubation in normal infants.
    Iohom G; Franklin R; Casey W; Lyons B
    Can J Anaesth; 2004 Feb; 51(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 14766692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of deep laryngeal oxygen insufflation during laryngoscopy in children: a randomized clinical trial.
    Steiner JW; Sessler DI; Makarova N; Mascha EJ; Olomu PN; Zhong JW; Setiawan CT; Handy AE; Kravitz BN; Szmuk P
    Br J Anaesth; 2016 Sep; 117(3):350-7. PubMed ID: 27466252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of performance of C-MAC
    Sinha R; Kumar KR; Kalaiyarasan RK; Khanna P; Ray BR; Pandey RK; Punj J; Darlong V
    Indian J Anaesth; 2019 Apr; 63(4):284-288. PubMed ID: 31000892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy Using Miller and McCoy Blade.
    Mahadevaiah T; T S D; Rani R; K N V; G M S
    Cureus; 2022 May; 14(5):e24914. PubMed ID: 35698670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intubation conditions with CMAC Miller videolaryngoscope and conventional Miller laryngoscope in lateral position in infants: A prospective randomized trial.
    Jain D; Mehta S; Gandhi K; Arora S; Parikh B; Abas M
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2018 Mar; 28(3):226-230. PubMed ID: 29316004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the laryngoscopy views with the size 1 Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope blades lifting the epiglottis or the base of the tongue in infants and children <2 yr of age.
    Passi Y; Sathyamoorthy M; Lerman J; Heard C; Marino M
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Nov; 113(5):869-74. PubMed ID: 25062740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lower flange modification improves performance of the Macintosh, but not the Miller laryngoscope blade.
    Kimberger O; Fischer L; Plank C; Mayer N
    Can J Anaesth; 2006 Jun; 53(6):595-601. PubMed ID: 16738295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of the Storz Miller 1 video laryngoscope in a simulated infant difficult intubation.
    Fiadjoe JE; Stricker PA; Hackell RS; Salam A; Gurnaney H; Rehman MA; Litman RS
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1783-6. PubMed ID: 19448202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Success of Two Techniques for the Endotracheal Intubation with C-MAC Video Laryngoscope Miller Blade in Children: A Prospective Randomized Study.
    Sinha R; Sharma A; Ray BR; Kumar Pandey R; Darlong V; Punj J; Chandralekha C; Upadhyay AD
    Anesthesiol Res Pract; 2016; 2016():4196813. PubMed ID: 27293429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of C-MAC Miller blade video laryngoscope with conventional Miller blade in infants undergoing elective surgery- A prospective randomised trial.
    Manhas S; Agrawal N; Jain S; Sharma R; Choudhary R
    Indian J Anaesth; 2023 Feb; 67(Suppl 2):S133-S139. PubMed ID: 37122941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh blade.
    Achen B; Terblanche OC; Finucane BT
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2008 Sep; 36(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 18853593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of Airtraq™ optical Laryngoscope and Miller's blade in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation: A randomized, controlled trial.
    Das B; Samanta A; Mitra S; Jamil SN
    Indian J Anaesth; 2017 Apr; 61(4):326-331. PubMed ID: 28515521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade: a comparison with the Miller size 1 and Macintosh size 2 laryngoscope blades.
    Jones RM; Jones PL; Gildersleve CD; Hall JE; Harding LJ; Chawathe MS
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Oct; 59(10):1016-9. PubMed ID: 15488063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniocervical motion during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation with the Macintosh and Miller blades: an in vivo cinefluoroscopic study.
    LeGrand SA; Hindman BJ; Dexter F; Weeks JB; Todd MM
    Anesthesiology; 2007 Dec; 107(6):884-91. PubMed ID: 18043056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design, development, and face validation of an intubation simulation device using real-time force data feedback.
    Rao GM; Rao VM; Juang J; Benoit J; Feng AL; Song PC
    Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 7(5):1506-1512. PubMed ID: 36262463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pediatric laryngoscope blade size selection using facial landmarks.
    Mellick LB; Edholm T; Corbett SW
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2006 Apr; 22(4):226-9. PubMed ID: 16651910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usefulness of C-curved stylet for intubation with the C-MAC® Miller videolaryngoscope in neonates and infants: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Park JB; Kang PY; Kim T; Ji SH; Jang YE; Kim EH; Kim JT; Kim HS; Lee JH
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2023 Oct; 76(5):433-441. PubMed ID: 36550777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of plastic single-use and metal reusable laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia.
    Amour J; Marmion F; Birenbaum A; Nicolas-Robin A; Coriat P; Riou B; Langeron O
    Anesthesiology; 2006 Jan; 104(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16394691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.