156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28584958)
1. A predictive diagnostic model using multiparametric MRI for differentiating uterine carcinosarcoma from carcinoma of the uterine corpus.
Kamishima Y; Takeuchi M; Kawai T; Kawaguchi T; Yamaguchi K; Takahashi N; Ito M; Arakawa T; Yamamoto A; Suzuki K; Ogawa M; Takeuchi M; Shibamoto Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):472-483. PubMed ID: 28584958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: MRI findings including diffusion-weighted imaging and MR spectroscopy.
Takeuchi M; Matsuzaki K; Harada M
Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 26787673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: MR findings.
Tanaka YO; Tsunoda H; Minami R; Yoshikawa H; Minami M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Aug; 28(2):434-9. PubMed ID: 18666176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unenhanced region on magnetic resonance imaging represents tumor progression in uterine carcinosarcoma.
Inoue A; Yamaguchi K; Kurata Y; Murakami R; Abiko K; Hamanishi J; Kondoh E; Baba T; Kido A; Konishi I; Matsumura N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 28(5):e62. PubMed ID: 28657223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps obtained using 3.0T MRI for distinguishing uterine carcinosarcoma from endometrial carcinoma.
Takahashi M; Kozawa E; Tanisaka M; Hasegawa K; Yasuda M; Sakai F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 26605502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and multiparametric MRI features for differentiating uterine carcinosarcoma from endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
Chen X; Guo Q; Chen X; Zheng W; Kang Y; Cao D
BMC Med Imaging; 2024 Feb; 24(1):48. PubMed ID: 38373912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiating focal eosinophilic liver disease from hepatic metastases using unenhanced and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.
Kim YK; Lee YH; Kim CS; Lee MW
Abdom Imaging; 2011 Aug; 36(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 21748468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography for Preoperative Staging of Patients with Non-endometrioid Carcinomas of the Uterine Corpus.
Lakhman Y; Katz SS; Goldman DA; Yakar D; Vargas HA; Sosa RE; Miccò M; Soslow RA; Hricak H; Abu-Rustum NR; Sala E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1271-8. PubMed ID: 25665953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current Status of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Malignant Uterine Neoplasms: A Review.
Huang YT; Huang YL; Ng KK; Lin G
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 30627019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Staging MRI of uterine malignant mixed Müllerian tumors versus endometrial carcinomas with emphasis on dynamic enhancement characteristics.
Garza A; Elsherif SB; Faria SC; Sagebiel T; Sun J; Ma J; Bhosale PR
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Apr; 45(4):1141-1154. PubMed ID: 31190089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Pathologic Findings of 26 Cases With Uterine Adenomatoid Tumors.
Meng Q; Zeng Q; Wu X; Wan Q; Lei Y; Song T; Gu X; Hong G; Zhang W; Li X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 26017919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: radiologic-pathologic correlations with magnetic resonance imaging including diffusion-weighted imaging.
Kato H; Kanematsu M; Furui T; Imai A; Hirose Y; Kondo H; Goshima S; Tsuge Y
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Dec; 26(10):1446-50. PubMed ID: 18501546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: magnetic resonance imaging.
Takemori M; Nishimura R; Yasuda D; Sugimura K
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1997; 43(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 9067724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uterine carcinosarcoma and high-risk endometrial carcinomas: a clinicopathological comparison.
Zhang C; Hu W; Jia N; Li Q; Hua K; Tao X; Wang L; Feng W
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):629-36. PubMed ID: 25633654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging features of hepatic sarcomatous carcinoma on computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Gu KW; Kim YK; Min JH; Ha SY; Jeong WK
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1424-1433. PubMed ID: 28078380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of MR Imaging as a Tool to Differentiate between the Major Histological Types of Uterine Sarcomas.
Sumi A; Terasaki H; Sanada S; Uchida M; Tomioka Y; Kamura T; Yano H; Abe T
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2015; 14(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 26104072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric MRI as Predictive Factors for Differentiating Uterine Sarcoma From Atypical Leiomyoma.
Bi Q; Xiao Z; Lv F; Liu Y; Zou C; Shen Y
Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):993-1002. PubMed ID: 29422425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted MRI for pre-operative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion and pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma.
Koplay M; Dogan NU; Erdogan H; Sivri M; Erol C; Nayman A; Karabagli P; Paksoy Y; Celik C
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Oct; 58(5):538-46; quiz 648. PubMed ID: 25046775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential and leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: MR findings.
Tanaka YO; Nishida M; Tsunoda H; Okamoto Y; Yoshikawa H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 20(6):998-1007. PubMed ID: 15558559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary utilization of radiomics in differentiating uterine sarcoma from atypical leiomyoma: Comparison on diagnostic efficacy of MRI features and radiomic features.
Xie H; Hu J; Zhang X; Ma S; Liu Y; Wang X
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():39-45. PubMed ID: 31084757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
