These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28585057)

  • 1. A dual memory theory of the testing effect.
    Rickard TC; Pan SC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):847-869. PubMed ID: 28585057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant materials: On the influence of recall type.
    Kubik V; Nilsson LG; Olofsson JK; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 26243692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extension of the dual-memory model of test-enhanced learning to distributions and individual differences.
    Rickard TC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):783-790. PubMed ID: 32409922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
    Rowland CA
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1432-63. PubMed ID: 25150680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
    Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
    Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall.
    Pan SC; Lovelett J; Stoeckenius D; Rickard TC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):634-640. PubMed ID: 30937830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
    Wissman KT; Rawson KA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
    Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
    Hopper WJ; Huber DE
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention and the testing effect.
    Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 28849580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sleep reduces the testing effect-But not after corrective feedback and prolonged retention interval.
    Abel M; Haller V; Köck H; Pötschke S; Heib D; Schabus M; Bäuml KT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 29698042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The negative testing and negative generation effects are eliminated by delay.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1014-25. PubMed ID: 25329076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional underpinnings of feedback-enhanced test-potentiated encoding.
    Ludowicy P; Czernochowski D; Arnaez-Telleria J; Gurunandan K; Lachmann T; Paz-Alonso PM
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 May; 33(10):6184-6197. PubMed ID: 36585773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.
    Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti N; Deluca J
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 20230121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.