500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28585179)
1. Effective gene editing by high-fidelity base editor 2 in mouse zygotes.
Liang P; Sun H; Sun Y; Zhang X; Xie X; Zhang J; Zhang Z; Chen Y; Ding C; Xiong Y; Ma W; Liu D; Huang J; Songyang Z
Protein Cell; 2017 Aug; 8(8):601-611. PubMed ID: 28585179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Engineering of high-precision base editors for site-specific single nucleotide replacement.
Tan J; Zhang F; Karcher D; Bock R
Nat Commun; 2019 Jan; 10(1):439. PubMed ID: 30683865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simplified CRISPR tools for efficient genome editing and streamlined protocols for their delivery into mammalian cells and mouse zygotes.
Jacobi AM; Rettig GR; Turk R; Collingwood MA; Zeiner SA; Quadros RM; Harms DW; Bonthuis PJ; Gregg C; Ohtsuka M; Gurumurthy CB; Behlke MA
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():16-28. PubMed ID: 28351759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysing the outcome of CRISPR-aided genome editing in embryos: Screening, genotyping and quality control.
Mianné J; Codner GF; Caulder A; Fell R; Hutchison M; King R; Stewart ME; Wells S; Teboul L
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():68-76. PubMed ID: 28363792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of the production of knock-in alleles by CRISPR/Cas9 microinjection into the mouse zygote.
Raveux A; Vandormael-Pournin S; Cohen-Tannoudji M
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42661. PubMed ID: 28209967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gene editing in mouse zygotes using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Wefers B; Bashir S; Rossius J; Wurst W; Kühn R
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():55-67. PubMed ID: 28263886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Engineering CRISPR/Cpf1 with tRNA promotes genome editing capability in mammalian systems.
Wu H; Liu Q; Shi H; Xie J; Zhang Q; Ouyang Z; Li N; Yang Y; Liu Z; Zhao Y; Lai C; Ruan D; Peng J; Ge W; Chen F; Fan N; Jin Q; Liang Y; Lan T; Yang X; Wang X; Lei Z; Doevendans PA; Sluijter JPG; Wang K; Li X; Lai L
Cell Mol Life Sci; 2018 Oct; 75(19):3593-3607. PubMed ID: 29637228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current Status and Challenges of DNA Base Editing Tools.
Jeong YK; Song B; Bae S
Mol Ther; 2020 Sep; 28(9):1938-1952. PubMed ID: 32763143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening of CRISPR/Cas base editors to target the AMD high-risk Y402H complement factor H variant.
Tran MTN; Khalid MKNM; Pébay A; Cook AL; Liang HH; Wong RCB; Craig JE; Liu GS; Hung SS; Hewitt AW
Mol Vis; 2019; 25():174-182. PubMed ID: 30996586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electroporation of AsCpf1/RNP at the Zygote Stage is an Efficient Genome Editing Method to Generate Knock-Out Mice Deficient in Leukemia Inhibitory Factor.
Kim YS; Kim GR; Park M; Yang SC; Park SH; Won JE; Lee JH; Shin HE; Song H; Kim HR
Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2020 Feb; 17(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 32002841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expanded targeting scope and enhanced base editing efficiency in rabbit using optimized xCas9(3.7).
Liu Z; Chen M; Shan H; Chen S; Xu Y; Song Y; Zhang Q; Yuan H; Ouyang H; Li Z; Lai L
Cell Mol Life Sci; 2019 Oct; 76(20):4155-4164. PubMed ID: 31030226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-Fidelity Cytosine Base Editing in a GC-Rich Corynebacterium glutamicum with Reduced DNA Off-Target Editing Effects.
Heo YB; Hwang GH; Kang SW; Bae S; Woo HM
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Dec; 10(6):e0376022. PubMed ID: 36374037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Engineering the Delivery System for CRISPR-Based Genome Editing.
Glass Z; Lee M; Li Y; Xu Q
Trends Biotechnol; 2018 Feb; 36(2):173-185. PubMed ID: 29305085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Direct Generation of Conditional Alleles Using CRISPR/Cas9 in Mouse Zygotes.
Pritchard CEJ; Kroese LJ; Huijbers IJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1642():21-35. PubMed ID: 28815491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CRISPR-Cas9 system-driven site-specific selection pressure on Herpes simplex virus genomes.
Li Z; Bi Y; Xiao H; Sun L; Ren Y; Li Y; Chen C; Cun W
Virus Res; 2018 Jan; 244():286-295. PubMed ID: 28279800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 and linear repair templates in C. elegans.
Paix A; Folkmann A; Seydoux G
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():86-93. PubMed ID: 28392263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage.
Komor AC; Kim YB; Packer MS; Zuris JA; Liu DR
Nature; 2016 May; 533(7603):420-4. PubMed ID: 27096365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Somatic mosaicism and allele complexity induced by CRISPR/Cas9 RNA injections in mouse zygotes.
Yen ST; Zhang M; Deng JM; Usman SJ; Smith CN; Parker-Thornburg J; Swinton PG; Martin JF; Behringer RR
Dev Biol; 2014 Sep; 393(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 24984260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Precision genome editing in the CRISPR era.
Salsman J; Dellaire G
Biochem Cell Biol; 2017 Apr; 95(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 28177771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [CRISPR/CAS9, the King of Genome Editing Tools].
Bannikov AV; Lavrov AV
Mol Biol (Mosk); 2017; 51(4):582-594. PubMed ID: 28900076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
