BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28585406)

  • 1. MR-safe personal radiation dosimeters.
    Tchistiakova E; Kim A; Song WY; Pang G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 18(4):180-184. PubMed ID: 28585406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of magnetic field effects on the dose-response of 3D dosimeters for magnetic resonance - image guided radiation therapy applications.
    Lee HJ; Roed Y; Venkataraman S; Carroll M; Ibbott GS
    Radiother Oncol; 2017 Dec; 125(3):426-432. PubMed ID: 28964533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alanine dosimetry in strong magnetic fields: use as a transfer standard in MRI-guided radiotherapy.
    Billas I; Bouchard H; Oelfke U; Shipley D; Gouldstone C; Duane S
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jun; 65(11):115001. PubMed ID: 32191920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Influence of Magnetic Fields (0.05 T ≤ B ≤ 7 T) on the Response of Personal Thermoluminescent Dosimeters to Ionizing Radiation.
    Copty A; Rabineg G; Berg A
    Health Phys; 2019 Oct; 117(4):345-352. PubMed ID: 31136314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electron contamination modeling and skin dose in 6 MV longitudinal field MRIgRT: Impact of the MRI and MRI fringe field.
    Oborn BM; Metcalfe PE; Butson MJ; Rosenfeld AB; Keall PJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):874-90. PubMed ID: 22320797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD) in a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment: implications for personnel exposure monitoring.
    Mehrara E
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38701767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters in the spread-out Bragg peak region of clinical proton beams.
    Kerns JR; Kry SF; Sahoo N
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1854-63. PubMed ID: 22482607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physico-chemical properties and optimization of the deformable FlexyDos3D radiation dosimeter.
    Wheatley MJ; Balatinac AS; Booth JT; De Deene Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(21):215028. PubMed ID: 30403194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remote auditing of radiotherapy facilities using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters.
    Lye J; Dunn L; Kenny J; Lehmann J; Kron T; Oliver C; Butler D; Alves A; Johnston P; Franich R; Williams I
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032102. PubMed ID: 24593737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) dosimetric characteristics with accumulated dose.
    Jursinic PA
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):132-40. PubMed ID: 20175474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biological effects of static magnetic field exposure in the context of MR-guided radiotherapy.
    Mohajer JK; Nisbet A; Velliou E; Ajaz M; Schettino G
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 92(1094):20180484. PubMed ID: 30359096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selecting passive dosimetry technologies for measuring the external dose of terrestrial wildlife.
    Aramrun P; Beresford NA; Wood MD
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Feb; 182():128-137. PubMed ID: 29227874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of the 4D composite MR image distortion field associated with tumor motion for MR-guided radiotherapy.
    Stanescu T; Jaffray D
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1550-62. PubMed ID: 26936738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical Note: Experimental results from a prototype high-field inline MRI-linac.
    Liney GP; Dong B; Begg J; Vial P; Zhang K; Lee F; Walker A; Rai R; Causer T; Alnaghy SJ; Oborn BM; Holloway L; Metcalfe P; Barton M; Crozier S; Keall P
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5188. PubMed ID: 27587049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of an optically stimulated dosimeter for dentomaxillofacial dosimetry.
    Valiyaparambil JV; Mallya SM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):793-7. PubMed ID: 21983291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of low magnetic field on single-diode dosimetry for clinical use.
    Choi CH; Park JM; An HJ; Kim JI
    Phys Med; 2019 Apr; 60():132-138. PubMed ID: 31000073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a 3D remote dosimetry protocol compatible with MRgIMRT.
    Mein S; Rankine L; Adamovics J; Li H; Oldham M
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):6018-6028. PubMed ID: 28877344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remote Cherenkov imaging-based quality assurance of a magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy system.
    Andreozzi JM; Mooney KE; Brůža P; Curcuru A; Gladstone DJ; Pogue BW; Green O
    Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2647-2659. PubMed ID: 29663429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo simulation of the dose response of a novel 2D silicon diode array for use in hybrid MRI-LINAC systems.
    Gargett M; Oborn B; Metcalfe P; Rosenfeld A
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):856-65. PubMed ID: 25652498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of quantitative imaging biomarkers in clinical trials for MR-guided radiotherapy: Conceptual guidance for multicentre studies from the MR-Linac Consortium Imaging Biomarker Working Group.
    van Houdt PJ; Saeed H; Thorwarth D; Fuller CD; Hall WA; McDonald BA; Shukla-Dave A; Kooreman ES; Philippens MEP; van Lier ALHMW; Keesman R; Mahmood F; Coolens C; Stanescu T; Wang J; Tyagi N; Wetscherek A; van der Heide UA
    Eur J Cancer; 2021 Aug; 153():64-71. PubMed ID: 34144436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.